Cited by 166Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

On the logic and purpose of significance testing.

Cortina, Jose M., Dunlap, William P.·1997·Psychological Methods

Abstract

There has been much recent attention given to the problems involved with the traditional approach to null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). Many have suggested that, perhaps, NHST should be abandoned altogether in favor of other bases for conclusions such as confidence intervals and effect size estimates (e.g., Schmidt, 1996). The purposes of this article are to (a) review the function that data analysis is supposed to serve in the social sciences, (b) examine the ways in which these functions are performed by NHST, (c) examine the case against NHST, and (d) evaluate interval-based estimation as an alternative to NHST.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1082-989x.2.2.161

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many cases, researchers aim to decide whether significant results are consistent or inconsistent with directional (dividing) hypotheses.

    “in many cases, researchers aim to decide whether significant results are consistent or inconsistent with directional (dividing) hypotheses”

    From Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings? (2020) · cites this paper as Cortina & Dunlap, 1997, p. 168

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cortina, J. M., & Dunlap, W. P.
Venue
Psychological Methods
Published
1997-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
161-172
ISSN
  • 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1463
OpenAlex
W2153986420
Cited by
166
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
13.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
null hypothesis significance testing, confidence intervals, effect size estimation, social science research, statistical inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review