Cited by 164Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchInternational Student and Expatriate ChallengesCounseling Practices and Supervision

Existential hazards of the multicultural individual: Defining and understanding "cultural homelessness."

Vivero, Veronica Navarrete, Jenkins, Sharon Rae·1999·Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology

Abstract

Cultural homelessness (CH) is the authors' term to describe unique experiences and feelings reported by some multicultural individuals. Ethnically related concepts found in the cross-cultural and multiethnic literature (e.g., marginality, intercultural effectiveness, ethnic enclaves, reference group) are used to explain how CH may arise from cross-cultural tensions within the ethnically mixed family and between the family and its culturally different environment, especially due to geographic moves. CH is conceptualized as a situationally imposed developmental challenge, forcing the child to accommodate to contradictory and changing norms, values, verbal and nonverbal communication styles, and attachment processes. Culturally homeless individuals may enjoy a broader, stronger cognitive and social repertoire because of their multiple cultural frames of reference. However, code-switching,complexities may lead to emotional and social confusion, which, if internalized, may result in self-blame and shame. Culturally encoded emotion labeling may be disrupted, leading to alexithymia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1099-9809.5.1.6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most traditional acculturation studies have operationalized biculturalism largely as a uniform construct, overlooking individual variations in the way bicultural identity is negotiated and organized.

    “In conclusion, most traditional acculturation studies have operationalized biculturalism largely as a uniform construct, overlooking individual variations in the way bicultural identity is negotiated and organized (see qualitative studies by Phinney &Devich-Navarro, 1997, andVivero &Jenkins, 1999, for exceptions).”

    From Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents (2005) · cites this paper as Vivero &Jenkins, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vivero, V. N., & Jenkins, S. R.
Venue
Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology
Published
1999
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
6-26
ISSN
  • 1077-341X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0106
  • 1099-9809
OpenAlex
W2124779611
Cited by
164
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
code-switching, emotional confusion, self-blame, shame, alexithymia, family relocation, intercultural effectiveness, ethnic enclaves, reference groups, attachment processes
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Development, Ethnicity, Existentialism, Humans, Prejudice, Risk Factors, Social Conformity, Social Identification, Social Isolation, Socialization, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review