Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our results are supportive of previously reported examples of gender-based discrimination and the challenges faced by women in various spheres of life, including education and professional opportunities.
“Moreover, our results are supportive of previously reported examples of gender-based discrimination and the challenges faced by women in various spheres of life, including education and professional opportunities [90–93].”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [92]
Cites
Heilman, M. E. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234 · Cited by 2,482 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0023557 · Cited by 1,748 · see citing works
Self-citationGender and leadership emergence: A meta-analysis and explanatory model
Badura, K. L., Grijalva, E., Newman, D. A., Yan, T. T., & Jeon, G. (2018) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12266 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters
Gulati, A., Martínez-Garcia, M., Fernández, D., Lozano, M. A., Lepri, B., & Oliver, N. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240882 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eagly, A. H., & Sczesny, S.
- Venue
- The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality.
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 21-47
- OpenAlex
- W2280857753
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 54.91
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Keywords
- gender stereotypes, leadership, gender differences, stereotypes of women, change over time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
