Cited by 143

Couples therapy for domestic violence: Finding safe solutions.

Stith, Sandra M., McCollum, Eric E., Rosen, Karen H.·2011

Abstract

As you will see throughout the book, we have made significant efforts to provide skilled assessment at the beginning of treatment, structural modifications to treatment sessions, and ongoing monitoring throughout to increase the safety of our clients as much as we can"--Introduction. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/12329-000

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dyadic treatment for IPV is contraindicated in relationships experiencing intimate partner terrorism or severe physical violence.

    “Dyadic treatment for IPV has been found to be successful in treating couples who experience situational violence (Karakurt et al., 2016) but is contraindicated in relationships experiencing intimate partner terrorism or severe physical violence (Stith et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stith, S. M., McCollum, E. E., & Rosen, K. H.
Published
2011
Cited by
143
References
10
Language
en
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1 R21 MH54613-02A1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review