The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An essay towards a new theory of vision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans
Hickok, G. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21189 · Cited by 887
Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy
Kellman, P. J., & Spelke, E. S. (1983) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90017-8 · Cited by 802
Intermodal matching by human neonates
Meltzoff, A. N., & Borton, R. W. (1979) · Nature · doi:10.1038/282403a0 · Cited by 623
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Gori, M., Del Viva, M., Sandini, G., & Burr, D. C. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.036 · Cited by 547
(2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Berkeley, G.
- Venue
- The works of George Berkeley, D.D., late bishop of Cloyne in Ireland: To which is added an account of his life and several of his letters to Thomas Prior, Esq., Dean Gervais, Mr. Pope &c., Vol 1.
- Publisher
- Richard Priestley
- Published
- 2012-12-11
- Pages
- 227-316
- OpenAlex
- W2481153139
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.72
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An essay towards a new theory of vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/14116-004
- The paper
- Berkeley, G. (2012). An essay towards a new theory of vision. The works of George Berkeley, D.D., late bishop of Cloyne in Ireland: To which is added an account of his life and several of his letters to Thomas Prior, Esq., Dean Gervais, Mr. Pope &c., Vol 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/14116-004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.