CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 223Educational Research and MethodsPsychology Research and BibliometricsQualitative Comparative Analysis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances.

·2014·American Psychological Association eBooks
DOI 10.1037/14376-000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Thanks to remarkable methodological and statistical advances in recent years, Single-Case design (SCD) research has become a viable and often essential option for researchers in applied psychology, education, and related fields. This text is a compendium of information and tools for researchers considering SCD research, a methodology in which one or several participants (or other units) comprise a systematically-controlled experimental intervention study. SCD is a highly flexible method of conducting applied intervention research where it is not feasible or practical to collect data from traditional groups of participants. Initial chapters lay out the key components of SCDs, from articulating dependent variables to documenting methods for achieving experimental control and selecting an appropriate design model. Subsequent chapters show when and how to implement SCDs in a variety of contexts and how to analyze and interpret results. Authors emphasize key design and analysis tactics, such as randomization, to help enhance the internal validity and scientific credibility of individual studies. This rich resource also includes in-depth descriptions of large-scale SCD research projects being undertaken at key institutions; practical suggestions from journal editors on how to get SCD research published; and detailed instructions for free, user-friendly, web-based randomization software.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/14376-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–223 of 223

Related

See all

Metadata

Venue
American Psychological Association eBooks
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Published
2014
DOI
10.1037/14376-000
OpenAlex
W2302472531
Cited by
223
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
FWCI
33.83
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Keywords
single-case experimental design, experimental control, randomization, internal validity, design model, dependent variables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review