The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychotherapy case formulation.
Abstract
This book presents an integrative psychotherapy case formulation model emphasizing an evidence-based approach to treatment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinician biases can compromise the validity and reliability of case formulation.
“These biases can compromise the validity and reliability of CF (Eells, 2015).”
From Data-Informed Case Formulation with the Trier Treatment Navigator (2022) · cites this paper as Eells, 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data-Informed Case Formulation with the Trier Treatment Navigator
Moggia, D., Schaffrath, J., Bommer, J., Weinmann-Lutz, B., & Lutz, W. (2022) · Revista de Psicoterapia · doi:10.33898/rdp.v33i123.35971 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Eells, T. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eells, Tracy D.
- ORCID
- Eells, Tracy D.
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2015
- OpenAlex
- W2491987985
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- integrative psychotherapy, evidence-based treatment, treatment planning, psychotherapy models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
