Cited by 141Gender Roles and Identity StudiesEmotions and Moral BehaviorGender and Feminist Studies

Masculinity, Shame, and Fear of Emotions as Predictors of Men's Expressions of Anger and Hostility.

Jakupcak, Matthew, Tull, Matthew T., Roemer, Lizabeth·2005·Psychology of Men & Masculinity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1524-9220.6.4.275

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jakupcak, M., Tull, M. T., & Roemer, L.
Affiliations
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Venue
Psychology of Men & Masculinity
Published
2005-10
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
275-284
ISSN
  • 1524-9220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-151X
OpenAlex
W1972701654
Cited by
141
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Men & Masculinity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
masculinity, shame, fear of emotions, anger expression, hostility, men, emotional expression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review