The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autobiographical memory specificity and affect regulation: An experimental approach.
Open accessAbstract
This study investigated J. M. G. Williams's (1996) affect-regulation hypothesis that level of specificity of autobiographical memory (AM) is used to minimize negative affect. It was found that a negative event leads to more reports of subjective stress in high- as compared with low-specific participants. Also, afterward, high-specific participants rated their unprompted memories for the event as more unpleasant. The results indicate that, relative to high specificity, being less specific in the retrieval of AMs is associated with less affective impact of a negative event. Results are discussed within the affect-regulation model. It is suggested that future research take a more functional perspective on AM specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Autobiographical memory in suicide attempters.
Williams, J. M., & Broadbent, K. (1986) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.95.2.144 · Cited by 1,330
Self-citationThe specificity of autobiographical memory and imageability of the future
Williams, J. M. G., Ellis, N. C., Tyers, C., Healy, H., Rose, G., & Macleod, A. K. (1996) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197278 · Cited by 526
Self-citation
Cited by
Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder.
Williams, J. M. G., Barnhofer, T., Crane, C., Herman, D., Raes, F., Watkins, E., & Dalgleish, T. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.122 · Cited by 1,688
“In these cases, stopping short of episodic retrieval is functional (Raes et al., 2003) and is negatively reinforced by the nonoccurrence of expected aversive consequences.”
BackgroundSelf-citationEpisodic Simulation of Future Events: Concepts, Data, and Applications
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.001 · Cited by 840
Emotion and autobiographical memory
Holland, A. C., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.01.006 · Cited by 540
Dalgleish, T., & Werner-Seidler, A. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.010 · Cited by 288
Hargus, E., Crane, C., Barnhofer, T., & Williams, J. M. G. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0016825 · Cited by 212
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Raes, F., Hermans, D., de Decker, A., Eelen, P., & Williams, J. M. G.
- Venue
- Emotion
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-206
- ISSN
- 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1516
- OpenAlex
- W2044053935
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autobiographical memory specificity and affect regulation: An experimental approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/1528-3542.3.2.201
- The paper
- Raes, F., Hermans, D., de Decker, A., Eelen, P., & Williams, J. M. G. (2003). Autobiographical memory specificity and affect regulation: An experimental approach. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.2.201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
