Automatic affective evaluation does not automatically predispose for arm flexion and extension
Abstract
Affect may have the function of preparing organisms for action, enabling approach and avoidance behavior. M. Chen and J. A. Bargh (1999) suggested that affective processing automatically resulted in action tendencies for arm flexion and extension. The crucial question is, however, whether automaticity of evaluation was actually achieved or whether their results were due to nonautomatic, conscious processing. When faces with emotional expressions were evaluated consciously, similar effects were obtained as in the M. Chen and J. A. Bargh study. When conscious evaluation was reduced, however, no action tendencies were observed, whereas affective processing of the faces was still evident from affective priming effects. The results suggest that tendencies for arm flexion and extension are not automatic consequences of automatic affective information processing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Arm flexion (approach) is elicited by happy faces and faster arm extension (avoidance) is elicited by angry faces.
“Arm flexion (approach) is elicited by happy faces and faster arm extension (avoidance) is elicited by angry faces [31], [32]”
From A direct examination of the effect of intranasal administration of oxytocin on approach-avoidance motor responses to emotional stimuli (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
The simple perception of affective stimuli has been sufficient to induce motivational tendencies in a large number of published studies.
“although it should be noted that the simple perception of affective stimuli has been sufficient to induce motivational tendencies in a large number of published studies [27], [31], [32].”
From A direct examination of the effect of intranasal administration of oxytocin on approach-avoidance motor responses to emotional stimuli (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 232
- Authors
- Rotteveel, M., & Phaf, R. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Emotion
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156-172
- ISSN
- 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1516
- OpenAlex
- W2060323875
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emotion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- arm flexion and extension, action tendencies, conscious processing, affective priming, facial expressions, emotional expression recognition, approach-avoidance behavior, automaticity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Arm, Automatism, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Movement, Reaction Time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review