The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information.
Open accessAbstract
Verbal working memory (WM) tasks typically involve the language production architecture for recall; however, language production processes have had a minimal role in theorizing about WM. A framework for understanding verbal WM results is presented here. In this framework, domain-specific mechanisms for serial ordering in verbal WM are provided by the language production architecture, in which positional, lexical, and phonological similarity constraints are highly similar to those identified in the WM literature. These behavioral similarities are paralleled in computational modeling of serial ordering in both fields. The role of long-term learning in serial ordering performance is emphasized, in contrast to some models of verbal WM. Classic WM findings are discussed in terms of the language production architecture. The integration of principles from both fields illuminates the maintenance and ordering mechanisms for verbal information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
Baddeley, A. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2 · Cited by 7,359 · cited 2×
“In theory, any new word is a nonword; studies have shown correlations between verbal WM span and nonword repetition ability (e.g., Gathercole, Willis, Emslie, & Baddeley, 1992) as well as correlations between speaking rate and memory span (Cowan et al. 1998; Jarrold, Hewes, & Baddeley, 2000).”
BackgroundThe magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Working memory: Looking back and looking forward
Baddeley, A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1201 · Cited by 5,200
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Syntactic persistence in language production
Bock, J. K. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 · Cited by 1,911
INFORMATION, ACOUSTIC CONFUSION AND MEMORY SPAN
CONRAD, R., & HULL, A. J. (1964) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1964.tb00928.x · Cited by 713
Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.
Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.972 · Cited by 626
Order error in immediate recall of sequences
Conrad, R. (1965) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(65)80015-9 · Cited by 198
Cited by
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
Rogers, M., Hwang, H., Toplak, M., Weiss, M., & Tannock, R. (2011) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2010.544648 · Cited by 181
Working memory profiles of children with dyslexia, developmental language disorder, or both
Gray, S., Fox, A. B., Green†, S., Alt, M., Hogan, T. P., Petscher, Y., & Cowan, N. (2019) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-l-18-0148 · Cited by 127
Geva, S., Bennett, S., Warburton, E. A., & Patterson, K. (2011) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.511236 · Cited by 67
The effect of rehearsal rate and memory load on verbal working memory
Fegen, D., Buchsbaum, B. R., & D'Esposito, M. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.034 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-68
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2104666576
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
