Cited by 626Reading and Literacy DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.

Engle, Randall W., Cantor, Judy, Carullo, Julie J.·1992·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

A relationship has consistently been found between measures of working memory and reading comprehension. Four hypotheses for this relationship were tested in 3 experiments. In the first 2 experiments, a moving window procedure was used to present the operation-word and reading span tasks. High- and low-span subjects did not differentially trade off time on the elements of the tasks and the to-be-remembered word. Furthermore, the correlation between span and comprehension was undiminished when the viewing times were partialed out. Experiment 3 compared a traditional experimenter-paced simple word-span and a subject-paced span in their relationship with comprehension. The experimenter-paced word-span correlated with comprehension but the subject-paced span did not. The results of all 3 experiments support a general capacity explanation for the relationship between working memory and comprehension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.972

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performance on the OSpan task measures the attentional resources available to the individual on a moment-to-moment basis.

    “As in experiment 1, performance on the OSpan task measures the attentional resources available to the individual on a moment-to-moment basis (Engle et al. 1992).”
  • Performance on the OSpan assesses the domain-general attentional resources available to the individual on a moment-to-moment basis.

    “Performance on the OSpan assesses the domaingeneral attentional resources ' available to the individual on a moment-to-moment basis ' (Engle et al. 1992).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
1992
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
972-992
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2045491217
Cited by
626
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
FWCI
14.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
working memory, reading comprehension, word span, operation span, individual differences, viewing time
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Humans, Individuality, Memory, Short-Term, Reaction Time, Reading, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review