The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations.
Abstract
Sampling has been the single most influential component of conducting research with lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations. Poor sampling designs can result in biased results that will mislead other researchers, policymakers, and practitioners. Investigators wishing to study LGB populations must therefore devote significant energy and resources to choosing a sampling approach and executing the sampling plan. The authors describe probability and nonprobability sampling methods used in LGB populations and critically discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the sampling methods they review. The authors conclude that no single sampling methodology is correct or incorrect for use in LGB populations; rather, researchers must evaluate advantages and disadvantages of each sampling methodology in the context of the specific research question and the research design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932
Prejudice as stress: Conceptual and measurement problems
Meyer, I. H. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.2.262 · Cited by 504
Self-citation
Cited by
Sexual orientation concealment and mental health: A conceptual and meta-analytic review.
Pachankis, J. E., Mahon, C. P., Jackson, S. D., Fetzner, B. K., & Bränström, R. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000271 · Cited by 433
Mustanski, B., & Liu, R. T. (2013) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0013-9 · Cited by 424
Inclusive Anti-bullying Policies and Reduced Risk of Suicide Attempts in Lesbian and Gay Youth
Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Keyes, K. M. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.08.010 · Cited by 340
Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research
Abrams, J. A., Tabaac, A., Jung, S., & Else-Quest, N. M. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113138 · Cited by 319
Lucassen, M. F., Stasiak, K., Samra, R., Frampton, C. M., & Merry, S. N. (2017) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867417713664 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, I. H., & Wilson, P. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-31
- ISSN
- 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2075052655
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0014587
- The paper
- Meyer, I. H., & Wilson, P. A. (2009). Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014587
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
