Can the influence of childhood socioeconomic status on men’s and women’s adult body mass be explained by adult socioeconomic status or personality? Findings from a national sample.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: On the basis of a life-course risk-chain framework, the authors examined whether (a) residual associations between childhood socioeconomic status (SES) and adult obesity and body mass index (BMI) would be observed in women but not men after adjusting for adult SES, (b) adult Big Five personality traits would be associated with adult body mass in both genders, and (c) personality would explain unique variation in outcomes beyond child and adult SES. DESIGN: National survey (Midlife Development in the United States study; N = 2,922). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BMI and obesity. RESULTS: (a) In both genders, association between childhood SES and adult obesity were accounted for entirely by adult SES, but its effect on adult BMI was observed only in women; (b) higher conscientiousness was associated with lower obesity prevalence and BMI in both genders, although more strongly in women, and in men, greater obesity prevalence was associated with higher agreeableness and neuroticism; and (c) personality explained unique outcome variation in both genders. CONCLUSIONS: Early social disadvantage may affect adult weight status more strongly in women owing to gender differences in the timing and nature of weight-management socialization. Personality may enhance or detract from risks incurred by childhood or adulthood SES in either gender, necessitating the consideration of dispositional differences in prevention and intervention programs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More Extraverted people appear susceptible to smoking, regardless of whether older or new operationalizations of Extraversion are used.
“This effect was accounted for in part by smoking, a health behavior to which more Extraverted people appear susceptible, regardless of whether older or new operationalizations of Extraversion are used [82–85].”
From Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine (2011) · cites this paper as [84]
Elevated Neuroticism has been linked to weight gain and obesity.
“With respect to health behaviors, elevated has been linked to weight gain and obesity [84, 109] and smoking [110], general etiologic factors in foreshortened longevity.”
From Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine (2011) · cites this paper as [84]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 100
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Greene WH Econometric Analysis 2003 Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ 5th ed.
- Authors
- Chapman, B. P., Fiscella, K., Duberstein, P., Coletta, M., & Kawachi, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Health Psychology
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 419-427
- ISSN
- 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7810
- PMC
- PMC2732202
- OpenAlex
- W2115461669
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Public Health Service (T32MH073452; K08AG031328)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Keywords
- childhood socioeconomic status, adult obesity, body mass index, adult socioeconomic status, Big Five personality traits, conscientiousness, gender differences, middle-aged adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Character, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Personality Inventory, Sex Factors, Socialization, Socioeconomic Factors, Statistics as Topic, United States, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
