The DOI matches its Crossref record; 507 of the 507 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?
Open accessAbstract
Focusing primarily on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), this article reviews evidence regarding the roles of subregions of the medial temporal lobes, prefrontal cortex, posterior representational areas, and parietal cortex in source memory. In addition to evidence from standard episodic memory tasks assessing accuracy for neutral information, the article considers studies assessing the qualitative characteristics of memories, the encoding and remembering of emotional information, and false memories, as well as evidence from populations that show disrupted source memory (older adults, individuals with depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, or schizophrenia). Although there is still substantial work to be done, fMRI is advancing understanding of source memory and highlighting unresolved issues. A continued 2-way interaction between cognitive theory, as illustrated by the source monitoring framework (M. K. Johnson, S. Hashtroudi, & D. S. Lindsay, 1993), and evidence from cognitive neuroimaging studies should clarify conceptualization of cognitive processes (e.g., feature binding, retrieval, monitoring), prior knowledge (e.g., semantics, schemas), and specific features (e.g., perceptual and emotional information) and of how they combine to create true and false memories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,080
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
Baddeley, A. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2 · Cited by 7,359 · cited 2×
“They also argued that inferior parietal cortex appears to be more directly involved in recollection, and they suggested it may correspond to the episodic buffer theorized by Baddeley (2000). In any event, as Wagner et al.”
BackgroundThe Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory
(2010) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-62209-1 · Cited by 5,994
The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates
Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl004 · Cited by 5,128
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0626 · Cited by 4,674
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020071 · Cited by 4,540
(1997) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089297765555359 · Cited by 3,916
Cited by
The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y · Cited by 1,372
Memory distortion: an adaptive perspective
Schacter, D. L., Guerin, S. A., & St. Jacques, P. L. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.004 · Cited by 507
Human Neuroscience and the Aging Mind: A New Look at Old Problems
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Park, D. C. (2010) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbq035 · Cited by 447
Ranganath, C. (2010) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20852 · Cited by 375
Frequency-specific network connectivity increases underlie accurate spatiotemporal memory retrieval
Watrous, A. J., Tandon, N., Conner, C. R., Pieters, T., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3315 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, K. J., & Johnson, M. K.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 638-677
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2039491568
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 507
- FWCI
- 18.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG09253; AG15793)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0015849
- The paper
- Mitchell, K. J., & Johnson, M. K. (2009). Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory? Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.