It does not have to be uncomfortable: The role of behavioral scripts in Black–White interracial interactions.
Abstract
Despite growing racioethnic diversity in U.S. organizations, few organizational studies have focused on Black-White interracial interactions. Two experiments examined the influence of interaction roles, and the social scripts they trigger, on White participants' anxiety during dyadic interactions with Black partners. Results from both studies reveal that White participants exhibited greater discomfort in Black-White interactions than in same-race interactions unless their interaction role offered an accessible script to guide behavior. Thus, the present findings suggest organizations may be able to attenuate anxiety among White employees by (a) providing opportunities for initial Black-White interactions in settings with clearly defined social scripts for behavior and (b) helping them to develop behavioral scripts for naturally occurring Black-White workplace interactions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Whites in particular show more anxiety than Blacks around inter-racial interactions.
“Whites in particular show more anxiety than Blacks around inter-racial interactions (Avery, Richeson, Hebl, & Ambady, 2009).”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Avery, Richeson, Hebl, & Ambady, 2009
Cites
Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247 · Cited by 4,510 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library
Brook, F., Ellenwood, D., & Lazzaro, A. E. (2015) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2015.0048 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
- Authors
- Avery, D. R., Richeson, J. A., Hebl, M. R., & Ambady, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Houston (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Rice University (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1382-1393
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2136269857
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- interracial interaction, social scripts, workplace diversity, White employees, interracial contact, organizational diversity
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Male, Nonverbal Communication, Psychology, Social, Race Relations, Social Behavior, United States, Workplace, Black People, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review