Cited by 85Identity, Memory, and TherapyEgo Development and Educational PracticesAging and Gerontology Research

Psychosocial development from college through midlife: A 34-year sequential study.

Whitbourne, Susan Krauss, Sneed, Joel R., Sayer, Aline·2009·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Two cohorts of alumni, leading-edge and trailing-edge baby boomers, first tested in their college years, were followed to ages 43 (N = 136) and 54 (N = 182) on a measure of Erikson's theory of psychosocial development. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to model the trajectory of growth for each psychosocial issue across middle adulthood. As predicted, the early psychosocial issues (trust, autonomy, and initiative) showed patterns of slow and steady increases in favorable resolution, as did the midlife issue of generativity. Industry, found in earlier investigations on the samples to change to differing degrees by cohort, continued to show cohort differences through midlife. The quadratic terms indicated that growth was curvilinear for both cohorts on identity and intimacy, and ego integrity showed variations by cohort, with the older cohort showing steeper patterns of increases. Gender differences were observed on intimacy, with women receiving higher initial scores, but the curves showed deceleration through midlife. Tests of variations in growth curves by the life history variables of educational attainment, occupational prestige, commitment to a long-term relationship, and parenthood status showed variations by cohort, but a general pattern of catching up emerged in which those who entered early adulthood at a relative disadvantage in terms of psychosocial development were able to attain favorable outcomes by midlife.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016550

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 85

Authors
Whitbourne, S. K., Sneed, J. R., & Sayer, A.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2009-09
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1328-1340
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2150922526
Cited by
85
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Ego Development and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
psychosocial development, midlife, baby boomers, cohort differences, generativity, industry, ego integrity, intimacy, identity, trust, autonomy, initiative, gender differences, educational attainment, occupational prestige, parenthood, long-term relationships, developmental trajectories
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Educational Status, Employment, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Personality, Retrospective Studies, Self Concept, Socialization, Universities, Cohort Studies, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review