Cited by 33Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Naloxone, but not flupenthixol, disrupts the development of conditioned ejaculatory preference in the male rat.

Ismail, Nafissa, Girard-Bériault, Fabienne, Nakanishi, Satoru, Pfaus, James G.·2009·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Male rats display a conditioned preference to ejaculate with a female bearing an odor paired previously with copulation to ejaculation. The present study examined the role of endogenous opioid and dopamine systems in this preference. Male rats received saline, the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, or the dopamine receptor antagonist flupenthixol prior to 10 conditioning trials in a pacing chamber with an almond-scented female. On the final test, all males were injected with saline and given access to 2 females, 1 scented and the other unscented, in an open field. Only males injected with naloxone during training failed to manifest a conditioned ejaculatory preference. These findings suggest that activation of opioid, but not dopamine, systems during sexual interaction are necessary for conditioned ejaculatory preference in male rats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017096

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When rats mate, they associate ejaculation reward with non-social cues and can form preferences for location or non-social odors.

    “Instead, when rats mate, they associate the reward from ejaculation with non-social cues and can form preferences for the location or for non-social odors (Miller and Baum 1987; Mehrara and Baum 1990; Ismail et al 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ismail, N., Girard-Bériault, F., Nakanishi, S., & Pfaus, J. G.
Affiliations
Concordia University (CA)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2009
Volume
123
Issue
5
Pages
992-999
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2003674988
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-74563)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
naloxone, flupenthixol, opioid system, dopaminergic system, opioid antagonists, dopamine antagonists, male sexual behavior, copulation
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Association Learning, Choice Behavior, Copulation, Dopamine, Ejaculation, Female, Flupenthixol, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Odorants, Receptors, Dopamine, Receptors, Opioid, Smell, Dopamine Antagonists, Opioid Peptides, Rats, Long-Evans, Recognition, Psychology, Rats, Mating Preference, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review