Therapist strategies for building involvement in cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent depression
Abstract
This study examined predictive relations between 9 therapist behaviors and client involvement in manual-guided, cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent depression. Analyses included 42 adolescents who met criteria for a depressive disorder (major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, or adjustment disorder with depressed mood) and who were treated in school-based clinics. Therapist behaviors hypothesized to promote client involvement were coded from Session 1 audiotapes; client involvement was coded from Session 2. Unlike prior research, the current study examined associations between behaviors and involvement while controlling for initial client resistance to isolate the therapist contribution to involvement. Results show that 3 therapist behaviors from Session 1 (attending to teen's experience, exploring teen's motivation, and less structure) predicted greater client involvement in Session 2, controlling for initial resistance. Only exploring motivation and less structure uniquely predicted Session 2 involvement when the 3 behaviors were examined simultaneously. Session 1 therapist behaviors predicted significant variance in involvement at Sessions 2, 4, and 8. Client initial presentation as resistant was associated with more exploring motivation and praising, but initial resistance did not explain associations between therapist behaviors and involvement. Implications for implementing evidence-based treatments are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In depressed adolescents, observed resistance in CBT session 1 was low overall, but higher resistance significantly predicted the total number of sessions completed.
“For example, Jungbluth and Shirk (2009) noted that even though observed resistance levels in CBT session 1 for a group of depressed adolescents were quite low, higher resistance significantly predicted the total number of sessions completed.”
From Comparing the predictive capacity of observed in-session resistance to self-reported motivation in cognitive behavioral therapy (2011) · cites this paper as Jungbluth and Shirk (2009)
Resistance was a substantial predictor of CBT task involvement in later sessions, explaining 33% of the variance in later involvement.
“Resistance was a substantive predictor of CBT task involvement in subsequent sessions, accounting for 33% of the variance in subsequent involvement.”
From Comparing the predictive capacity of observed in-session resistance to self-reported motivation in cognitive behavioral therapy (2011) · cites this paper as Jungbluth and Shirk (2009)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Jungbluth, N. J., & Shirk, S. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1179-1184
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W1967182951
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH065988-01)
- Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (F31)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy, adolescent depression, client participation, therapist behavior, client resistance, session structure, school-based treatment, evidence-based treatment implementation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review