Cited by 66Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Therapist strategies for building involvement in cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent depression

Jungbluth, Nathaniel J., Shirk, Stephen R.·2009·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This study examined predictive relations between 9 therapist behaviors and client involvement in manual-guided, cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent depression. Analyses included 42 adolescents who met criteria for a depressive disorder (major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, or adjustment disorder with depressed mood) and who were treated in school-based clinics. Therapist behaviors hypothesized to promote client involvement were coded from Session 1 audiotapes; client involvement was coded from Session 2. Unlike prior research, the current study examined associations between behaviors and involvement while controlling for initial client resistance to isolate the therapist contribution to involvement. Results show that 3 therapist behaviors from Session 1 (attending to teen's experience, exploring teen's motivation, and less structure) predicted greater client involvement in Session 2, controlling for initial resistance. Only exploring motivation and less structure uniquely predicted Session 2 involvement when the 3 behaviors were examined simultaneously. Session 1 therapist behaviors predicted significant variance in involvement at Sessions 2, 4, and 8. Client initial presentation as resistant was associated with more exploring motivation and praising, but initial resistance did not explain associations between therapist behaviors and involvement. Implications for implementing evidence-based treatments are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017325

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 66

Authors
Jungbluth, N. J., & Shirk, S. R.
Affiliations
University of Denver (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2009
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1179-1184
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W1967182951
Cited by
66
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH065988-01)
  • Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (F31)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, adolescent depression, client participation, therapist behavior, client resistance, session structure, school-based treatment, evidence-based treatment implementation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review