Cited by 62Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Comparing the predictive capacity of observed in-session resistance to self-reported motivation in cognitive behavioral therapy

Open access
Westra, Henny A.·2011·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Self-report measures of motivation for changing anxiety have been weakly and inconsistently related to outcome in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). While clients may not be able to accurately report their motivation, ambivalence about change may nonetheless be expressed in actual therapy sessions as opposition to the direction set by the therapist (i.e., resistance). In the context of CBT for generalized anxiety disorder, the present study compared the ability of observed in-session resistance in CBT session 1 and two self-report measures of motivation for changing anxiety (the Change Questionnaire & the Client Motivational for Therapy Scale) to (1) predict client and therapist rated homework compliance (2) predict post-CBT and one-year post-treatment worry reduction, and (3) differentiate those who received motivational interviewing prior to CBT from those who received no pre-treatment. Observed in-session resistance performed very well on each index, compared to the performance of self-reported motivation which was inconsistent and weaker relative to observed resistance. These findings strongly support both clinician sensitivity to moments of client resistance in actual therapy sessions as early as session 1, and the inclusion of observational process measures in CBT research. © 2010.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2010.11.007

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    In simultaneous regression with all motivation measures, only lower observed resistance in session 1 significantly predicted higher therapist-rated and client-rated homework compliance (therapist: t=-3.94, p<.001, beta=-.58; client: t=-4.16, p<.001, beta=-.59).

    “only lower levels of observed resistance in session 1 was significantly predictive of higher therapist rated, t = −3.94, p<.001, beta = −.58, and client rated, t = −4.16, p<.001, beta = −.59, homework compliance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Higher CQ scores predicted greater worry reduction at both post-treatment and one-year follow-up, explaining 16-17% of the variance.

    “Higher scores on the CQ also predicted greater worry reduction at both time points, accounting for 16-17% of the variance in outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In simultaneous regression predicting client- and therapist-rated homework, none of the six CMOTS subscales met the significance threshold of p<.008.

    “when the 6 individual subscales of the CMOTS were entered simultaneously in the regression equation predicting client and then therapist rated homework, no subscale met the criterion for statistical significance of p<.008 (alpha=.05/6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    No significant time by group effect was observed for the CMOTS index of less self-determined motivation.

    “No significant time by group effect was observed for the CMOTS index of less self-determined motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In simultaneous regressions, the self-report motivation measures together explained 8% of therapist-rated and 12% of client-rated homework compliance variance.

    “Collectively, self-report measures of motivation accounted for 8% and 12% of the variance in therapist and client rated homework compliance, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 29
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the Westra et al. (2009) study, the CMOTS did not predict outcome, but clients with high baseline worry reported larger increases in intrinsic motivation from pre- to post-MI than those with moderate worry.

    “And while the CMOTS failed to predict outcome in the Westra et al. (2009) study, those of high worry severity at baseline reported greater increases in intrinsic motivation from change from pre to post MI, compared to those of moderate worry severity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Westra et al. (2009) source

      The Results report a significant treatment-by-worry-severity interaction in intrinsic motivation after pretreatment (p = .013), supporting the greater increase among high-severity clients who received MI. The paper does not establish the broader assertion that the CMOTS failed to predict outcome: it reports a marginally significant interaction between baseline intrinsic motivation and treatment group for post-CBT worry (p = .080). (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In CBT for generalized anxiety disorder, observed in-session resistance during session 1 predicted all three outcomes well, while the two self-report motivation measures were weaker and inconsistent.

    “Observed in-session resistance performed very well on each index, compared to the performance of self-reported motivation which was inconsistent and weaker relative to observed resistance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Observed early resistance explained at least three times as much variance in client-rated homework compliance as CQ scores, which explained 11%.

    “observed early resistance accounted for at least three times the amount of variance in client rated homework compliance compared with CQ scores (11%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For one-year post-treatment worry, lower early resistance (t=1.91, p=.068, beta=.33) and higher CQ scores (t=1.81, p=.083, beta=-.34) were marginally significant predictors.

    “both lower early resistance, t = 1.91, p=.068, beta=.33 and higher CQ scores, t = 1.81, p=.083, beta = −.34 were significantly predictive, albeit at a marginal level of significance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Higher scores on the CQ predicted greater client-rated homework compliance, but did not predict therapist-rated homework compliance.

    “Higher scores on the CQ were also predictive of higher levels of client rated homework compliance but not therapist rated homework compliance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Higher observed early resistance in the first CBT session predicted lower subsequent homework compliance as rated by both therapists and clients, explaining 36% and 39% of the variance respectively.

    “higher observed early resistance was a consistent and substantive predictor of subsequent lower client homework compliance as rated by both therapists and clients, accounting for 36% and 39% of the variance, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Higher observed early resistance significantly predicted poorer worry reduction at post-CBT and one-year follow-up, explaining 32% and 23% of the variance respectively.

    “Higher observed early resistance was a significant and substantive predictor of both poorer post-CBT and one-year post-treatment worry reduction, accounting for 32% and 23% of the variance in worry outcome respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A marginally significant time by treatment group effect occurred for the CMOTS index of more self-determined motivation, with a moderate effect size d=.73 (CI: .05 to 1.38); those who received MI reported greater increases in more self-determined motivation than those who received no pretreatment.

    “A marginally significant time by treatment group effect was obtained for the CMOTS index of more self-determined motivation, with a moderate effect size of d=.73 (CI: .05 to 1.38). Those who received MI reported greater increases in more self-determined motivation compared to those who received no pretreatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    When individual CMOTS subscales were examined, no significant time by treatment group interactions occurred for any subscale, although change in intrinsic motivation approached significance (p=.094).

    “when the individual subscales of the CMOTS were examined, there were no significant time by treatment group interactions for any of the subscale; although change in intrinsic motivation approached significance, p=.094.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In simultaneous regressions, self-report measures together explained 22% of post-treatment worry variance, while resistance explained an additional 21% beyond self-report.

    “Collectively, the self-report measures of motivation accounted for 22% of the variance in post-treatment worry, while resistance accounted for 21% of the variance beyond the self-report measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In simultaneous regressions for one-year worry, self-report measures together explained 23% of variance, while resistance explained an additional 8% beyond self-report.

    “Collectively, the self-report measures accounted for 23% of the variance in worry scores at one-year follow-up, while resistance accounted for an additional 8% of the variance beyond the self-report scales.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither CMOTS index nor its individual subscales was related to worry outcome.

    “both CMOTS indices, as well as individual CMOTS subscales, were unrelated to outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In simultaneous regressions, observed resistance explained an additional 30% of therapist-rated and 31% of client-rated homework compliance variance beyond the other motivation measures.

    “observed resistance accounted for 30% and 31% of the variance beyond the other measures of motivation in therapist rated and client rated homework compliance, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing self-report motivation measures reliably predict dropout from CBT for anxiety but do not reliably predict treatment outcome.

    “Existing measures reliably predict treatment dropout (e.g., Brogan, Prochaska, & Prochaska, 1999; Dozois, Westra, Collins, Fung, & Garry, 2004; Keijsers, Kampman, & Hoogduin, 2001) but not treatment outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brogan, Prochaska, & Prochaska, 1999 source
    • cites Dozois, Westra, Collins, Fung, & Garry, 2004 source
    • cites Keijsers, Kampman, & Hoogduin, 2001 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In the motivation literature, resistance and noncompliance in therapy are commonly viewed as signs of low motivation or ambivalence about change.

    “In fact, in the literature on motivation, resistance and noncompliance in therapy are commonly regarded as manifestations of low motivation or ambivalence about change (Engle & Arkowitz, 2006; Miller & Rollnick, 2002; Westra & Arkowitz, 2010)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Engle & Arkowitz, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Miller & Rollnick, 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Westra & Arkowitz, 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The study's results support clinicians paying attention to client resistance in actual therapy sessions as early as the first session.

    “These findings strongly support both clinician sensitivity to moments of client resistance in actual therapy sessions as early as session 1, and the inclusion of observational process measures in CBT research.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Therapist directiveness or demands for change reliably trigger resistance.

    “that are reliably triggered by therapist directiveness or demands for change (e.g., Beutler, Harwood, Michelson, Song, & Holman, in press; Miller, Benefield, & Tonigan, 1993; Patterson & Forgatch, 1985).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beutler, Harwood, Michelson, Song, & Holman, in press

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Miller, Benefield, & Tonigan, 1993 source
    • cites Patterson & Forgatch, 1985 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The CQ can be adapted to a 3-item version suitable for clinical practice.

    “The CQ can even be adapted to a 3-item version amenable for administration in clinical practice (Miller & Johnson, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Miller & Johnson, 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Higher early resistance significantly distinguished patients who continued to meet GAD criteria at one year from those who did not, and those who received no pretreatment before CBT from those who received MI.

    “Higher levels of early resistance also significantly distinguished both those who continued to meet diagnostic criteria for GAD one-year post-treatment compared to those who did not, as well as those who did not receive a pretreatment prior to CBT compared to those who received MI.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Higher HCS scores have been linked to more positive CBT outcomes.

    “Higher scores on the HCS have been associated with more positive outcome in CBT (Bryant, Simons, & Thase, 1999; Taft, Murphy, King, Musser, & DeDeyn, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bryant, Simons, & Thase, 1999 source
    • cites Taft, Murphy, King, Musser, & DeDeyn, 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The CRC has good construct and predictive validity, as well as face and content validity.

    “The CRC has been shown to possess good construct and predictive validity (Chamberlain Patterson, Reid, Kavanagh, & Forgatch, 1984; Patterson & Forgatch, 1985) as well as face and content validity (Bischoff & Tracey, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chamberlain Patterson, Reid, Kavanagh, & Forgatch, 1984

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Patterson & Forgatch, 1985 source
    • cites Bischoff & Tracey, 1995 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Observed resistance in actual therapy sessions is a very sensitive index of MI's impact, with MI recipients showing substantially more co-operation early in CBT than non-recipients.

    “These findings strongly suggest that observed resistance in actual therapy sessions is a very sensitive index of the impact of having received MI, with those receiving MI exhibiting substantially higher levels of co-operation early in CBT than those who did not receive MI.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Resistance to therapist direction is conceptualized as a behavioral expression of ambivalence about change or treatment, signaling that the therapist is pushing for changes the client is not ready for.

    “In this context, resistance to therapist direction is conceptualized as a behavioral expression of ambivalence about change or treatment; it represents a signal that the therapist is pushing the client to make changes or move in directions for which they are not yet ready (Miller & Rollnick, 2002; Moyers & Rollnick, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Miller & Rollnick, 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Moyers & Rollnick, 2002 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    All participants had a principal GAD diagnosis established with the ADIS-IV.

    “All participants had a principal diagnosis of GAD based on the administration of the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV (ADIS-IV: Brown, DiNardo, & Barlow, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brown, DiNardo, & Barlow, 1994

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Early resistance explained between 36% and 39% of variance in homework compliance and between 23% and 32% of variance in outcome.

    “the variance accounted for by early resistance was consistently impressive, accounting for between 36% to 39% of the variance in homework compliance, and between 23% to 32% of the variance in outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In CBT, resistance can appear in many forms, such as refusing homework, acting against in-session agreements, expressing high emotion toward the therapist, avoiding in session through silence or 'I don't know', debating gratuitously, and misinterpreting therapist comments.

    “Newman (1994) outlines various forms that resistance can take in CBT including refusal to follow through with homework, taking actions that run counter to what was agreed upon in session, high levels of expressed emotion toward the therapist, in-session avoidance such as silence or frequent use of “I don’t know”, gratuitous debates with the therapist, and misinterpretation of the therapist’s comm”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Newman (1994) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Change Questionnaire has good internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

    “The CQ has good internal consistency and test-retest reliability (Miller & Johnson, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Miller & Johnson, 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Interrater reliability for ADIS-IV diagnoses, based on a random 20% of audiotaped interviews, was good: overall kappa .75 and 1.0 for GAD; GAD severity rater correlation was r = .79, p < .001.

    “Inter-rater reliability based on a random sample of 20% of audiotaped interviews for those who were successfully enrolled in the study was good, with an overall kappa for all diagnoses of .75, and 1.0 for GAD. The correlation between raters for GAD severity was r = .79, p<.001.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Resistance in CBT has been observed to indicate misalliances, poor collaboration on tasks and goals, and opposition to the therapist's formulation of the client's problems.

    “Expressions of resistance in CBT have also been observed to indicate misalliances, lack of collaboration on tasks and goals and clients’ opposition to therapist formulation of the clients’ problems (Watson & McCullen, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Watson & McCullen, 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The CMOTS has good internal consistency, fits its theoretically derived factor structure, and has good convergent and discriminant validity.

    “They found that the scale had good internal consistency, conformed to the theoretically-derived factor structure and possessed good convergent and discriminant validity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pelletier et al., 1997 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The PSWQ has high internal consistency and temporal stability, good convergent and discriminant validity, and distinguishes GAD from other anxiety disorders.

    “The PSWQ possesses high internal consistency and temporal stability, as well as good convergent and discriminant validity (Brown, Antony, & Barlow, 1992; Meyer et al.). It also differentiates individuals with GAD from those with other anxiety disorders (Brown et al.).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brown, Antony, & Barlow, 1992 source
    • cites Meyer et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Self-report measures of motivation may be sensitive to response or self-presentation bias.

    “any self-report measure of motivation may be sensitive to response or self-presentation bias.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Higher CMOTS scores were associated with greater short- and long-term improvement in three psychotherapy types for depression.

    “Zuroff et al. (2007) reported that higher scores on the CMOTS were associated with increased rates of short- and long-term improvement in three different types of psychotherapy for depression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zuroff et al. (2007) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    ADIS-IV interviews were conducted by advanced clinical psychology graduate students trained to criterion.

    “ADIS-IV interviews were conducted by advanced clinical psychology graduate students who were trained to criterion in the administration of this diagnostic instrument.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The resistance coding team comprised four clinical psychology graduate students trained for one year until reliability was reached.

    “The team of coders consisted of four graduate students in clinical psychology who were trained over a period of one year by reviewing, coding, and discussing samples of videotape in bi-weekly meetings until reliability was achieved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The present sample consisted only of patients with GAD.

    “the present sample included only those with GAD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    The ability to detect and effectively manage resistance is a key clinical skill.

    “a number of investigators have suggested that the ability to detect and effectively mange resistance is a key clinical skill (Binder & Strupp, 1997; Burns & Auerbach, 1996; Safran & Muran, 1996; Westra & Dozois, 2008; Westra, in press).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Binder & Strupp, 1997 source
    • cites Burns & Auerbach, 1996
    • cites Safran & Muran, 1996 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To evaluate each measure's ability to predict homework compliance and outcome, the study used the CBT-alone group (N=38) so that receiving MI would not influence these measures.

    “For the evaluation of the capacity of each measure to predict homework compliance and outcome, the CBT alone group (no pre-treatment; N=38) was used in order to avoid any influence of having received MI on these measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Coders were blind to client outcome and pretreatment status and coded sessions independently.

    “Coders were blind to client outcome or pretreatment status and coded sessions independently.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Among the three motivation measures, higher observed resistance in CBT session 1 was the most consistent and strongest predictor of both proximal (lower homework compliance) and distal (less worry reduction post-CBT and at one-year follow-up) outcomes in CBT.

    “higher observed resistance in CBT session 1 was the most consistent and strongest predictor of both proximal (lower homework compliance) and distal (less worry reduction post-CBT and at one-year follow-up) outcomes in CBT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The two self-report motivation measures were inconsistently related to homework compliance and short- and long-term outcome, and did not consistently differentiate patients who received MI before CBT from those who did not.

    “the two self-report measures of motivation were inconsistently related to homework compliance, short and long term outcome, and failed to consistently differentiate those who received MI prior to CBT from those who did not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In depressed adolescents, observed resistance in CBT session 1 was low overall, but higher resistance significantly predicted the total number of sessions completed.

    “For example, Jungbluth and Shirk (2009) noted that even though observed resistance levels in CBT session 1 for a group of depressed adolescents were quite low, higher resistance significantly predicted the total number of sessions completed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jungbluth and Shirk (2009) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    A highly face-valid direct self-report questionnaire can perform as well as, and possibly better than, indirect or complex self-report measures of motivation.

    “a highly face-valid direct self-report questionnaire can fare as well and possibly better than indirect or complex self-report measures of motivation (Miller & Johnson, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Miller & Johnson, 2008 source
43 of 43
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-report measures of motivation may be affected by social desirability bias and ceiling effects, making them less accurate and less variable, and thus less able to predict outcomes.

    “In addition to definitional problems (e.g., Keijsers et al., 1999), self-report measures of motivation may be prone to social desirability bias (i.e., ceiling effects) and therefore may not accurately reflect client motivation and lack sufficient variability to predict outcomes.”
1 of 1

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Claim of at least double the predictive capacity conflicts with reported variance

    Minor

    At one-year follow-up, resistance accounted for 23% of the variance and the CQ for up to 17%. That is about 1.35 times as much, not at least twice as much.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Westra, H. A., Motivational interviewing in the treatment of anxiety. New York: Guilford Press, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westra, H. A.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Westra, Henny A.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
106-113
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077500672
Cited by
62
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34-MH072615)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
self-reported motivation, cognitive behavioral therapy, generalized anxiety disorder, homework compliance, worry reduction, motivational interviewing, ambivalence, outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review