Coping effectiveness and coping diversity under traumatic stress.
Abstract
The effectiveness of different strategies of coping and the impact of coping diversity were tested under traumatic stress conditions. Participants were 632 U.S. soldiers stationed in Iraq (mean age = 27.7, 98% male). Results indicate that four of nine functional coping strategies (including some emotion-focused coping) as defined by the COPE scale were inversely related to psychological symptom, whereas five of six dysfunctional strategies were positively related. Overall, in comparison to the norm group, soldiers showed a depressed level of functional coping strategies. Hierarchical regression, used to control for demographics and coping strategy intercorrelations, indicated that positive reinterpretation, emotional social support, and humor were most strongly related to lower psychological symptoms, whereas venting emotions, denial, mental disengagement, behavioral disengagement, and alcohol and drug use were related to higher levels of psychological symptoms. Two indices of coping diversity were tested. The index more strongly related to higher psychological adjustment was the sum of deviations from the mean of specific coping strategies combined with the alignment of functional and dysfunctional strategy clusters. Implications for research and application were discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Venting of emotions is associated with greater emotional avoidance.
“there is some evidence to suggest that the venting of emotions is associated with greater emotional avoidance (Riolli and Savicki, 2010).”
From Initial RCT of a distress tolerance treatment for individuals with substance use disorders (2012) · cites this paper as Riolli and Savicki, 2010
The SC condition's focus on verbalizing problems may have paradoxically increased patients' avoidance of distress.
“the focus within the SC condition of having patients verbalize and express ongoing problems and concerns (in the absence of direct instruction on skills for managing distress effectively) may have paradoxically increased their avoidance of this distress.”
From Initial RCT of a distress tolerance treatment for individuals with substance use disorders (2012) · cites this paper as Riolli and Savicki, 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 37 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Riolli, L., & Savicki, V.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Sacramento (US)
- Western Oregon University (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Stress Management
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-113
- ISSN
- 1072-5245 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3424
- OpenAlex
- W1985285251
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Stress Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- coping strategies, traumatic stress, military personnel, Iraq War, psychological symptoms, psychological adjustment, dysfunctional coping, emotion-focused coping, positive reappraisal, social support, humor, venting, denial, mental disengagement, behavioral disengagement, alcohol and drug use, COPE scale
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review