Cited by 66Resilience and Mental HealthPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchStress and Burnout Research

Coping effectiveness and coping diversity under traumatic stress.

Riolli, Laura, Savicki, Victor·2010·International Journal of Stress Management

Abstract

The effectiveness of different strategies of coping and the impact of coping diversity were tested under traumatic stress conditions. Participants were 632 U.S. soldiers stationed in Iraq (mean age = 27.7, 98% male). Results indicate that four of nine functional coping strategies (including some emotion-focused coping) as defined by the COPE scale were inversely related to psychological symptom, whereas five of six dysfunctional strategies were positively related. Overall, in comparison to the norm group, soldiers showed a depressed level of functional coping strategies. Hierarchical regression, used to control for demographics and coping strategy intercorrelations, indicated that positive reinterpretation, emotional social support, and humor were most strongly related to lower psychological symptoms, whereas venting emotions, denial, mental disengagement, behavioral disengagement, and alcohol and drug use were related to higher levels of psychological symptoms. Two indices of coping diversity were tested. The index more strongly related to higher psychological adjustment was the sum of deviations from the mean of specific coping strategies combined with the alignment of functional and dysfunctional strategy clusters. Implications for research and application were discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0018041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Venting of emotions is associated with greater emotional avoidance.

    “there is some evidence to suggest that the venting of emotions is associated with greater emotional avoidance (Riolli and Savicki, 2010).”

    From Initial RCT of a distress tolerance treatment for individuals with substance use disorders (2012) · cites this paper as Riolli and Savicki, 2010

  • The SC condition's focus on verbalizing problems may have paradoxically increased patients' avoidance of distress.

    “the focus within the SC condition of having patients verbalize and express ongoing problems and concerns (in the absence of direct instruction on skills for managing distress effectively) may have paradoxically increased their avoidance of this distress.”

    From Initial RCT of a distress tolerance treatment for individuals with substance use disorders (2012) · cites this paper as Riolli and Savicki, 2010

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 66

Authors
Riolli, L., & Savicki, V.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Sacramento (US)
  • Western Oregon University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Stress Management
Published
2010-05
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
97-113
ISSN
  • 1072-5245 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3424
OpenAlex
W1985285251
Cited by
66
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Stress Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
coping strategies, traumatic stress, military personnel, Iraq War, psychological symptoms, psychological adjustment, dysfunctional coping, emotion-focused coping, positive reappraisal, social support, humor, venting, denial, mental disengagement, behavioral disengagement, alcohol and drug use, COPE scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review