Cited by 757Education, Achievement, and GiftednessPsychological and Educational Research StudiesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention.

Hulleman, Chris S., Godes, Olga, Hendricks, Bryan L., Harackiewicz, Judith M.·2010·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

We tested whether a utility value intervention (via manipulated relevance) influenced interest and performance on a task and whether this intervention had different effects depending on an individual's performance expectations or prior performance. Interest was defined as triggered situational interest (i.e., affective and emotional task reactions) and maintained situational interest (i.e., inclination to engage in the task in the future). In 2 randomized experiments, 1 conducted in the laboratory and the other in a college classroom, utility value was manipulated through a writing task in which participants were asked to explain how the material they were learning (math or psychology) was relevant to their lives (or not). The intervention increased perceptions of utility value and interest, especially for students who were low in expected (laboratory) or actual (classroom) performance. Mediation analyses revealed that perceptions of utility value explained the effects of the intervention on interest and predicted performance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0019506

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Utility value interventions have shown particular promise for promoting student interest.

    “Utility value interventions have shown particular promise for promoting student interest-a key motiva -tional construct linked to engagement, persistence, and deep learning (Harackiewicz et al. 2016; Hulleman et al. 2010a, b; Renninger and Su 2012).”
  • Prompting students to reflect on the personal relevance of academic content can protect or even enhance utility value.

    “This finding supports the notion that prompting students to reflect on the personal relevance of academic content can protect or even enhance utility value, consistent with prior research on utility value interventions (e.g., Harackiewicz et al. 2016; Hulleman et al. 2010a, b ).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 104 · Cited by 757

Authors
Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M.
Affiliations
  • James Madison University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2010-11
Volume
102
Issue
4
Pages
880-895
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2160874178
Cited by
757
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 11
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
US Department of Education (R305C050055)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
utility value, situational interest, task performance, performance expectations, prior performance, task engagement, writing assignments, mathematics learning, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review