Seeing the forest for the trees: Prevalence of low scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fourth edition (WISC-IV).
Abstract
Low scores across a battery of tests are common in healthy people and vary by demographic characteristics. The purpose of the present article was to present the base rates of low scores for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fourth edition (WISC-IV; D. Wechsler, 2003). Participants included 2,200 children and adolescents between 6 and 16 years of age from the WISC-IV U.S. standardization sample. Measures considered in the base rates analyses included the 10 core subtests and the 4 index scores. Analyses were conducted for the entire standardization sample as well as stratified by different classifications of intelligence and different years of parental education. In the total sample, it is uncommon to have 6 or more subtest scores or 2 or more Index scores <or= 9th percentile. The prevalence of low scores typically increased with lesser intelligence and fewer years of parental education (e.g., children with below-average intelligence were 75 times more likely than children with above-intelligence to have at least one impaired subtest score). Consistent with existing studies of the base rates of low scores, some low scores on the WISC-IV were common in children and adolescents, and the frequency was related to a child's level of intelligence and parental education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The frequency of obtaining one or more low scores ≤ 5th percentile considering the four index scores from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale, Fourth edition (WISC-IV) is 14.6%.
“considering the four index scores from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale, Fourth edition (WISC-IV) is 14.6% (Brooks, 2010)”
From Cognitive weaknesses or impairments on the NIH toolbox cognition battery in children and adolescents: base rates in a normative sample and proposed methods for classification (2025) · cites this paper as Brooks, 2010
This finding is consistent with numerous prior studies on pediatric normative and standardization samples for various test batteries.
“This finding is consistent with numerous prior studies on pediatric normative and standardization samples for various test batteries (Brooks, 2010; Brooks and Iverson, 2012; Brooks et al., 2009, 2010a, 2010b, 2013b; Cook et al., 2019).”
From Cognitive weaknesses or impairments on the NIH toolbox cognition battery in children and adolescents: base rates in a normative sample and proposed methods for classification (2025) · cites this paper as Brooks, 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Verhaegh, J., Fontijn, W. F. J., & Resing, W. C. M. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.026 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Gaudet, C. E., Cook, N. E., Kavanaugh, B. C., Studeny, J., & Holler, K. (2019) · Applied Neuropsychology: Child · doi:10.1080/21622965.2017.1417126 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Cook, N. E., Iverson, G. L., & Karr, J. E. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473095
- Authors
- Brooks, B. L.
- Affiliations
- Alberta Children's Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Brooks, Brian L.
- ORCID
- Brooks, Brian L.
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 650-656
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2047548953
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- WISC-IV, base rates, intelligence testing, children and adolescents, subtest scores, index scores, parental education, standardization sample, healthy children
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Educational Status, Humans, Intelligence, Parents, Psychometrics, Reference Values, United States, Wechsler Scales, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review