Cited by 4Psychological Testing and AssessmentDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Prevalence of low test scores in a pediatric psychiatric inpatient population: applying multivariate base rate analyses

Open access
Gaudet, Charles E., Cook, Nathan E., Kavanaugh, Brian C., Studeny, Jane, Holler, Karen·2019·Applied Neuropsychology: Child

Abstract

The understanding of neuropsychological functioning in pediatric psychiatric inpatient populations is growing, but limited, resulting in interpretive challenges. This study examined the application of multivariate base rate (MVBR) analysis in a clinical sample to appraise its utility in characterizing the frequency of low scores, as well as predictors of low scores, when using a flexible test battery. Participants included 99 children from a psychiatric inpatient unit referred for neuropsychological testing. Children hospitalized with psychiatric disorders exhibited high rates of low scores at varying criteria across the battery of tests. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that after accounting for demographic and psychiatric factors, intellectual functioning accounted for approximately 26% of the variance in observed low scores. The results suggest that a substantial percentage of this population produces low scores on neuropsychological testing and, consistent with prior research, intellectual functioning is strongly associated with low score frequency. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the clinical application of MVBR analysis in a pediatric psychiatric inpatient population using a flexible test battery. Taken together, this investigation highlights the potential clinical utility of MVBR analysis when interpreting neuropsychological performance in clinical pediatric populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21622965.2017.1417126

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaudet, C. E., Cook, N. E., Kavanaugh, B. C., Studeny, J., & Holler, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Rhode Island (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Antioch University New England (US)
Corresponding author
Gaudet, Charles E.
Venue
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Published
2018-01-08
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
163-173
ISSN
  • 2162-2965 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2973
OpenAlex
W2782810736
Cited by
4
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Applied Neuropsychology Child (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
neuropsychological assessment, intellectual functioning, score interpretation, child psychopathology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review