Cited by 116Homelessness and Social IssuesUrban and Rural Development ChallengesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

A multisite comparison of supported housing for chronically homeless adults: “Housing first” versus “residential treatment first”

Open access
Tsai, Jack, Mares, Alvin S., Rosenheck, Robert A.·2010·Psychological Services

Abstract

Both direct placement in supported community housing and pre-treatment with time-limited residential treatment are used as approaches to helping chronically homeless adults exit from homelessness but relative effectiveness and cost remains untested. The current observational study utilized data from a national, multi-site housing project to determine whether clients who receive residential treatment or transitional housing before being placed into independent housing achieve superior outcomes than clients who are immediately placed into independent housing, and whether they incur greater healthcare costs. A total of 709 participants (131 and 578 participants in the respective groups) were assessed every 3 months for 2 years on housing outcomes, community adjustment, work and income, mental and physical health, and health service costs. Clients who received immediate, independent housing had more days in their own place, less days incarcerated, and reported having more choice over treatment; but no differences on other clinical or community adjustment outcomes. In this observational study, there were no clinical advantages for clients who had residential treatment or transitional housing prior to entry into community housing, but they incurred higher substance abuse service costs. Studies using randomized controlled trials of these conditions are needed to establish causation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0020460

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In chronically homeless adults, including veterans and non-veterans, no significant differences were found in substance use seriousness between independent housing and residential treatment/transitional housing groups, with the same finding replicated in a sub-group analysis using only participants with a substance use disorder at baseline.

    “No significant differences were found in substance use seriousness between independent housing and residential treatment/transitional housing groups, with same finding being replicated in a sub-group analysis using only participants with a substance use disorder at baseline”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Anderson A 1999 Comparative impact evaluation of two therapeutic programs for mentally ill chemical abusers International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 4 11 26
  2. Vaux A Athanassopulou M 1987 Social support appraisals and network resources Journal of community Psychology 15 537 556

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, J., Mares, A. S., & Rosenheck, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
Psychological Services
Published
2010-11
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
219-232
ISSN
  • 1541-1559 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-148X
OpenAlex
W2153141888
Cited by
116
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH062994)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
chronic homelessness, Housing First, residential treatment, transitional housing, health care costs, substance abuse services, mental health, physical health, incarceration, employment and income, community adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review