CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 111Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Childhood emotional abuse and attachment processes in the dyadic adjustment of dating couples.

Riggs, Shelley A., Cusimano, Angela M., Benson, Karen M.·2011·Journal of Counseling Psychology
DOI 10.1037/a0021319
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In an effort to improve understanding of the mechanisms that link early maltreatment to later outcomes, this study investigated the mediation effects of adult attachment processes on the association between childhood emotional abuse and later romantic relationships among heterosexual couples. College students and their dating partners (N = 310; 155 couples) completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, Experiences in Close Relationship Scale, and Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Using the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model (Kenny, Kashy, & Cook, 2006), multilevel modeling results indicated that memories of childhood emotional abuse reported by both students and their partners were significantly associated with attachment strategies, as well as romantic relationship quality. Findings supported hypothesized mediation effects of attachment anxiety and avoidance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0021319

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 93 references

2 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–110 of 110

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Riggs, S. A., Cusimano, A. M., & Benson, K. M.
Affiliations
University of North Texas (US)
ORCID
Riggs, Shelley A.
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2011-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
126-138
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
DOI
10.1037/a0021319
OpenAlex
W2157780541
Cited by
111
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
childhood emotional abuse, adult attachment, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, romantic relationship quality, dating couples, mediation, actor-partner interdependence, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child Abuse, Courtship, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Social Support, Reactive Attachment Disorder, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review