Cited by 160Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Assessing knowledge of mathematical equivalence: A construct-modeling approach.

Rittle-Johnson, Bethany, Matthews, Percival G., Taylor, Roger S., McEldoon, Katherine L.·2011·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Knowledge of mathematical equivalence, the principle that 2 sides of an equation represent the same value, is a foundational concept in algebra, and this knowledge develops throughout elementary and middle school. Using a construct-modeling approach, we developed an assessment of equivalence knowledge. Second through sixth graders (N = 175) completed the assessment on 2 occasions, 2 weeks apart. Evidence supported the reliability and validity of the assessment along a number of dimensions, and the relative difficulty of items was consistent with the predictions from our construct map. By Grade 5, most students held a basic relational view of equivalence and were beginning to compare the 2 sides of an equation. This study provides insights into the order in which students typically learn different aspects of equivalence knowledge. It also illustrates a powerful but underutilized approach to measurement development that is particularly useful for developing measures meant to detect changes in knowledge over time or after intervention

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0021334

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study by Rittle-Johnson et al. (2011), students' understanding of the equal sign progressed steadily from operational to relational.

    “In one study conducted to systematically evaluate second grade to sixth grade students' knowledge of mathematical equivalence (Rittle-Johnson, Matthews, Taylor & McEldoon, 2011), the researchers found that students give meaning to the equal sign in a constant progress, from operational to relational.”

    From Relational thinking: The bridge between arithmetic and algebra (2017) · cites this paper as Rittle-Johnson, Matthews, Taylor & McEldoon, 2011

  • That study found that most fifth-grade students considered operations on both sides of the equation and were aware of the equal sign's relational meaning in addition to its operational meaning.

    “The study demonstrated that especially most of the fifth grade students took the operations in both sides of the equation and that they were aware of the relational meaning of the equal sign besides its operational meaning.”

    From Relational thinking: The bridge between arithmetic and algebra (2017) · cites this paper as Rittle-Johnson et al., 2011

  • The fifth-grade class has a vital place for the development of the relational meaning of the equal sign.

    “This result is parallel to other research results which demonstrate that the fifth-grade class has a vital place for the development of the relational meaning of the equal sign (Rittle-Johnson et al., 2011).”

    From Relational thinking: The bridge between arithmetic and algebra (2017) · cites this paper as Rittle-Johnson et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rittle-Johnson, B., Matthews, P. G., Taylor, R. S., & McEldoon, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2011-02
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
85-104
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2099233120
Cited by
160
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
33.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DRL-0746565)
  • US Department of Education (R305B040110; R305B080008)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
mathematical equivalence, equation solving, assessment development, construct maps, algebraic thinking, elementary school students, junior high school students, reliability and validity, item difficulty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review