Cited by 435Emotions and Moral BehaviorPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Further evidence for mixed emotions.

Open access
Larsen, Jeff T., McGraw, A. Peter·2011·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Emotion theorists have long debated whether valence, which ranges from pleasant to unpleasant states, is an irreducible aspect of the experience of emotion or whether positivity and negativity are separable in experience. If valence is irreducible, it follows that people cannot feel happy and sad at the same time. Conversely, if positivity and negativity are separable, people may be able to experience such mixed emotions. The authors tested several alternative interpretations for prior evidence that happiness and sadness can co-occur in bittersweet situations (i.e., those containing both pleasant and unpleasant aspects). One possibility is that subjects who reported mixed emotions merely vacillated between happiness and sadness. The authors tested this hypothesis in Studies 1-3 by asking subjects to complete online continuous measures of happiness and sadness. Subjects reported more simultaneously mixed emotions during a bittersweet film clip than during a control clip. Another possibility is that subjects in earlier studies reported mixed emotions only because they were explicitly asked whether they felt happy and sad. The authors tested this hypothesis in Studies 4-6 with open-ended measures of emotion. Subjects were more likely to report mixed emotions after the bittersweet clip than the control clip. Both patterns occurred even when subjects were told that they were not expected to report mixed emotions (Studies 2 and 5) and among subjects who did not previously believe that people could simultaneously feel happy and sad (Studies 3 and 6). These results provide further evidence that positivity and negativity are separable in experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0021846

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People can experience mixed emotional feelings.

    “Although there are many opinions about whether human beings can feel mixed emotions11–13, more and more evidence supports the fact that people can experience mixed emotional feelings10,13,17.”

    From A Multimodal Dataset for Mixed Emotion Recognition (2024) · cites this paper as [10]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 15 · Cited by 435

Authors
Larsen, J. T., & McGraw, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
100
Issue
6
Pages
1095-1110
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2119110363
Cited by
435
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
FWCI
34.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
mixed emotions, valence, happiness, sadness, emotional experience, emotion measurement
MeSH terms
Conflict, Psychological, Emotions, Female, Gambling, Happiness, Humans, Judgment, Male, Motivation, Psychological Theory, Uncertainty, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review