Cited by 415Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Development and validation of a brief self-report measure of trauma exposure: The Trauma History Screen.

Open access
Carlson, Eve B., Smith, Steve R., Palmieri, Patrick A., Dalenberg, Constance, Ruzek, Josef I., Kimerling, Rachel, Burling, Thomas A., Spain, David A.·2011·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Although information about individuals' exposure to highly stressful events such as traumatic stressors is often very useful for clinicians and researchers, available measures are too long and complex for use in many settings. The Trauma History Screen (THS) was developed to provide a very brief and easy-to-complete self-report measure of exposure to high magnitude stressor (HMS) events and of events associated with significant and persisting posttraumatic distress (PPD). The measure assesses the frequency of HMS and PPD events, and it provides detailed information about PPD events. Test-retest reliability was studied in four samples, and temporal stability was good to excellent for items and trauma types and excellent for overall HMS and PPD scores. Comprehensibility of items was supported by expert ratings of how well items appeared to be understood by participants with relatively low reading levels. In five samples, construct validity was supported by findings of strong convergent validity with a longer measure of trauma exposure and by correlations of HMS and PPD scores with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. The psychometric properties of the THS appear to be comparable or better than longer and more complex measures of trauma exposure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0022294

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Norris FH 1990 Screening for traumatic stress: A scale of use in the general population Journal of Applied Social Psychology 20 1704 1718
  2. Shalev AY Ursano RJ Orner R Schnyder U 2003 Mapping the multidimensional picture of acute responses to traumatic stress Reconstructing early intervention after trauma 118–129 228 235 Oxford, United Kingdom Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlson, E. B., Smith, S. R., Palmieri, P. A., Dalenberg, C., Ruzek, J. I., Kimerling, R., Burling, T. A., & Spain, D. A.
Affiliations
  • National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Summa Health System (US)
  • Alliant University (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2011
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
463-477
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2162638605
Cited by
415
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 69876)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
trauma exposure, posttraumatic distress, post-traumatic stress disorder, self-report measures, brief screening instrument, test-retest reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, temporal stability, item comprehensibility, posttraumatic stress symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Rape, Veterans, Wounds and Injuries, Reproducibility of Results, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review