The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-report measures of prospective memory are reliable but not valid.
Abstract
Are self-report measures of prospective memory (ProM) reliable and valid? To examine this question, 240 undergraduate student volunteers completed several widely used self-report measures of ProM including the Prospective Memory Questionnaire (PMQ), the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ), the Comprehensive Assessment of Prospective Memory (CAPM) questionnaire, self-reports of retrospective memory (RetM), objective measures of ProM and RetM, and measures of involvement in activities and events, memory strategies and aids use, personality and verbal intelligence. The results showed that both convergent and divergent validity of ProM self-reports are poor, even though we assessed ProM using a newly developed, reliable continuous measure. Further analyses showed that a substantial proportion of variability in ProM self-report scores was due to verbal intelligence, personality (conscientiousness, neuroticism), activities and event involvement (busyness), and use of memory strategies and aids. ProM self-reports have adequate reliability, but poor validity and should not be interpreted as reflecting ProM ability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A study by Uttl and Kibreab (2011) found that naturalistic PM was not predicted by such a task”
From Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment (2015) · cites this paper as Uttl and Kibreab (2011)
Citations
Cites
A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-2400 · Cited by 6,118
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,345
Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues
Kaplan, R. M. (1982) · Cited by 1,799
Memory Observed: Remembering in Natural Contexts
Neisser, U. (1982) · Cited by 1,000
Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: A questionnaire study
Smith, G. N., Sala, S. D., Logie, R. H., & Maylor, E. A. (2000) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210050117735 · Cited by 670
Prospective Memory : Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives
Kliegel, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007) · Cited by 627
Everyday memory : actions and absent-mindedness
Harris, J. E., & Morris, P. (1984) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 487
Crawford, J. R., Smith, G. N., Maylor, E. A., Sala, S. D., & Logie, R. H. (2003) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210244000027 · Cited by 465
The Everyday Memory Questionnaire – revised: Development of a 13-item scale
Royle, J., & Lincoln, N. B. (2008) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280701223876 · Cited by 218
Prospective Memory: A New Focus for Research
Graf, P., & Uttl, B. (2001) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1006/ccog.2001.0504 · Cited by 186
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–103 of 103
Krätzig, L., Swain, T. L., & Takarangi, M. K. T. (2026) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2026.2671172
Bojulaia, M., & Pilotti, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1816605
What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?
Condello, K. J., Swain, T. L., Petropoulos, T., Stirling, N. S. J., Matson, L. A., & Takarangi, M. K. T. (2026) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2026.2692588
Metadata
- Authors
- Uttl, B., & Kibreab, M.
- Affiliations
- Mount Royal University (CA)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-68
- ISSN
- 1196-1961 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-7290
- OpenAlex
- W1975645279
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- prospective memory, self-report measures, questionnaire validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, reliability statistics, retrospective memory, verbal intelligence, conscientiousness, neuroticism
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Reproducibility of Results, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
