Cited by 118Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEducation and Military IntegrationPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Military youth and the deployment cycle: Emotional health consequences and recommendations for intervention.

Open access
Esposito-Smythers, Christianne, Wolff, Jennifer, Lemmon, Keith M., Bodzy, Mary, Swenson, Rebecca R., Spirito, Anthony·2011·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

The United States military force includes over 2.2 million volunteer service members. Three out of five service members who are deployed or are preparing for deployment have spouses and/or children. Stressors associated with the deployment cycle can lead to depression, anxiety, and behavior problems in children, as well as psychological distress in the military spouse. Further, the emotional and behavioral health of family members can affect the psychological functioning of the military service member during the deployment and reintegration periods. Despite widespread acknowledgment of the need for emotional and behavioral health services for youth from military families, many professionals in a position to serve them struggle with how to best respond and select appropriate interventions. The purpose of this paper is to provide an empirically based and theoretically informed review to guide service provision and the development of evidence based treatments for military youth in particular. This review includes an overview of stressors associated with the deployment cycle, emotional and behavioral health consequences of deployment on youth and their caretaking parent, and existing preventative and treatment services for youth from military families. It concludes with treatment recommendations for older children and adolescents experiencing emotional and behavioral health symptoms associated with the deployment cycle.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0024534

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Service members are exposed to unique stressors, including those specific to pre-deployment, deployment, and post-deployment periods.

    “Service members are also exposed to unique stressors, including those specific to pre-deployment, deployment, and post-deployment periods (Esposito-Smythers et al. 2011).”

    From Childhood adversity, adult stress, and the risk of major depression or generalized anxiety disorder in US soldiers: a test of the stress sensitization hypothesis (2017) · cites this paper as Esposito-Smythers et al. 2011

    The ‘Unique Stressors Associated With the Deployment Cycle’ section (page unavailable) identifies distinct pre-deployment, deployment, and post-deployment phases and says each brings unique stressors, but it describes those stressors primarily for families. The Conclusions (page unavailable) also discuss distress and family-related difficulties affecting service members, so the claim has support, though the source does not clearly assign distinct stressors to service members in each named phase. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sheppard SC Malatras J. Weil Israel AC The impact of deployment on US military families American Psychologist 2010 65 599 609 20822199
  2. Whaley AL Davis KE Cultural competence and evidence based-practice in mental health services American Psychologist 2007 62 563 574 17874897

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esposito-Smythers, C., Wolff, J., Lemmon, K. M., Bodzy, M., Swenson, R. R., & Spirito, A.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Madigan Army Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2011-08
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
497-507
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2011482466
Cited by
118
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH082164)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
military youth, deployment cycle, military families, military spouses, children of deployed parents, depression, anxiety, reintegration, stressors, evidence-based interventions, preventive services, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Child Behavior, Child Behavior Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Depressive Disorder, Family Health, Female, Humans, Male, Military Medicine, Military Personnel, Parent-Child Relations, Stress, Psychological, United States, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review