Individual differences in working memory capacity predict sleep-dependent memory consolidation.
Abstract
Decades of research have established that "online" cognitive processes, which operate during conscious encoding and retrieval of information, contribute substantially to individual differences in memory. Furthermore, it is widely accepted that "offline" processes during sleep also contribute to memory performance. However, the question of whether individual differences in these two types of processes are related to one another remains unanswered. We investigated whether working memory capacity (WMC), a factor believed to contribute substantially to individual differences in online processing, was related to sleep-dependent declarative memory consolidation. Consistent with previous studies, memory for word pairs reliably improved after a period of sleep, whereas performance did not improve after an equal interval of wakefulness. More important, there was a significant, positive correlation between WMC and increase in memory performance after sleep but not after a period of wakefulness. The correlation between WMC and performance during initial test was not significant, suggesting that the relationship is specific to change in memory due to sleep. This suggests a fundamental underlying ability that may distinguish individuals with high memory capacity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Working memory capacity is strongly correlated with sleep-dependent benefits for hippocampus-dependent declarative memories (word pair associates).
“Interestingly, a recent human study indicated that working memory capacity, a function that in a healthy brain is most closely linked to a cooperative activation of the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, is strongly correlated with sleep-dependent benefits for hippocampusdependent declarative memories (word pair associates) (374).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [374]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Fenn, K. M., & Hambrick, D. Z.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 404-410
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W1965829269
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- working memory capacity, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, individual differences, declarative memory, memory capacity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Sleep, Wakefulness, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review