Predictors of the first onset of a major depressive episode and changes in depressive symptoms across adolescence: Stress and negative cognitions.
Abstract
This 6-year longitudinal study examined stressors (e.g., interpersonal, achievement), negative cognitions (self-worth, attributions), and their interactions in the prediction of (a) the first onset of a major depressive episode (MDE), and (b) changes in depressive symptoms in adolescents who varied in risk for depression. The sample included 240 adolescents who were first evaluated in Grade 6 (M = 11.86 years old; SD = 0.57; 54.2% female) and then again annually through Grade 12. Stressful life events and depressive diagnoses were assessed with interviews; negative cognitions and depressive symptoms were assessed with self-report questionnaires. Discrete time hazard modeling revealed a significant interaction between interpersonal stressors and negative cognitions, indicating that first onset of an MDE was predicted by high negative cognitions in the context of low interpersonal stress, and by high levels of interpersonal stressors at both high and low levels of negative cognitions. Analyses of achievement stressors indicated significant main effects of stress, negative cognitions, and risk in the prediction of an MDE, but no interactions. With regard to the prediction of depressive symptoms, multilevel modeling revealed a significant interaction between interpersonal stressors and negative cognitions such that among adolescents with more negative cognitions, higher levels of interpersonal stress predicted higher levels of depressive symptoms, whereas at low levels of negative cognitions, the relation between interpersonal stressors and depression was not significant. Risk (i.e., maternal depression history) and sex did not further moderate these interactions. Implications for intervention are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interpersonal stress, psychosocial adversity, and the emotional climate in the family have been related to adolescents' symptoms of disorders.
“Interpersonal stress (Carter & Garber, 2011; Krackow & Rudolph, 2008; Pine, Cohen, Johnson & Brooks, 2002), psychosocial adversity (Foster, Webster, Weissman et al., 2008), and the emotional climate in the family (Nomura et al., 2002) have been related to adolescents’ symptoms of disorders.”
From Prospective Relations between Family Conflict and Adolescent Maladjustment: Security in the Family System as a Mediating Process (2015) · cites this paper as Carter & Garber, 2011
Cut-points on vulnerability measures are used in certain research contexts, most prominently in high-risk designs.
“Cut-points on vulnerability measures are used in certain research contexts, perhaps one of the most prominent examples of which is high-risk designs.”
From A Latent Structure Analysis of Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression in Adolescence (2019) · cites this paper as Carter & Garber, 2011
An additional advantage of high-risk designs is that the greater variability in vulnerability constructs they often afford yields greater statistical power to detect moderating effects by reducing standard errors without compromising parameter estimates.
“An additional advantage of high-risk designs is that the greater variability in vulnerability constructs they often afford yields greater statistical power to detect the presence of moderating effects by reducing standard errors without compromising parameter estimates (Carter & Garber, 2011; McClelland & Judd, 1993).”
From A Latent Structure Analysis of Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression in Adolescence (2019) · cites this paper as Carter & Garber, 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 135 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Carter, J. S., & Garber, J.
- Affiliations
- DePaul University (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 779-796
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- OpenAlex
- W1969440654
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 135
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R29 MH454580; K02 MH66249)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD15052)
- William T. Grant Foundation (1214–88; 173096)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- adolescent depression, depressive symptoms, interpersonal stress, negative thinking, self-worth, attribution, life events, maternal depression history, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adolescent, Child, Cognition, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mothers, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Theory, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Models, Statistical, Child of Impaired Parents, Age of Onset, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review