Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.
Open accessAbstract
Speech processing requires sensitivity to long-term regularities of the native language yet demands listeners to flexibly adapt to perturbations that arise from talker idiosyncrasies such as nonnative accent. The present experiments investigate whether listeners exhibit dimension-based statistical learning of correlations between acoustic dimensions defining perceptual space for a given speech segment. While engaged in a word recognition task guided by a perceptually unambiguous voice-onset time (VOT) acoustics to signal beer, pier, deer, or tear, listeners were exposed incidentally to an artificial "accent" deviating from English norms in its correlation of the pitch onset of the following vowel (F0) to VOT. Results across four experiments are indicative of rapid, dimension-based statistical learning; reliance on the F0 dimension in word recognition was rapidly down-weighted in response to the perturbation of the correlation between F0 and VOT dimensions. However, listeners did not simply mirror the short-term input statistics. Instead, response patterns were consistent with a lingering influence of sensitivity to the long-term regularities of English. This suggests that the very acoustic dimensions defining perceptual space are not fixed and, rather, are dynamically and rapidly adjusted to the idiosyncrasies of local experience, such as might arise from nonnative-accent, dialect, or dysarthria. The current findings extend demonstrations of "object-based" statistical learning across speech segments to include incidental, online statistical learning of regularities residing within a speech segment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (US)
- ORCID
- Holt, Lori L.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1939-1956
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- PMC
- PMC3285244
- OpenAlex
- W2097181372
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KiltHub Repository
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R01DC004674)
- National Science Foundation (0746067)
- National Organization for Hearing Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- statistical learning, word recognition, speech perception, voice onset time, fundamental frequency, perceptual space, incidental learning, dialects, dysarthria
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Humans, Learning, Psycholinguistics, Speech, Speech Perception, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review