The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relation between elementary students' recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective.
Abstract
Research indicates the need to further examine the dimensions of reading motivation. A clear theoretical basis is necessary for conceptualizing reading motivation and considering contextual differences therein. The present study develops and validates the SRQ-Reading Motivation, a questionnaire measuring recreational and academic reading motivation based on self-determination theory. The study clarifies the relation among reading motivation, reading self-concept, reading behavior (i.e., engagement and frequency), and reading performance (i.e., comprehension). Participants included 1,260 Flemish fifth-grade students and their 67 teachers. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that both recreational and academic reading motivation comprise 2 factors: autonomous and controlled motivation. This factor structure was found to be invariant across boys and girls. Comparisons of the SRQ-Reading Motivation with subscales of the Motivation for Reading Questionnaire provide evidence for the construct validity of the instrument. Structural equation modeling confirmed that recreational autonomous reading motivation is associated with more positive reading behavior and better performance. In the academic setting, only the equivalent relationship between autonomous reading motivation and leisure-time reading frequency could be corroborated. In this respect, the results confirm the independent contribution of recreational autonomous reading motivation and reading self-concept to reading behavior and performance. No significant indirect relationship between reading motivation and reading comprehension through reading frequency or reading engagement was found. The theoretical and practical significance of the present study is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338 · Cited by 6,937
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571 · Cited by 3,428 · cited 1×
“In this respect affording choices, offering rationale, recognizing interests, and offering help and support are promising reading promotion strategies (Reeve, 2002; Skinner & Belmont, 1993).”
BackgroundPerceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749 · Cited by 3,311
Enhancing Students' Engagement by Increasing Teachers' Autonomy Support
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/b:moem.0000032312.95499.6f · Cited by 1,594
Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory
Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00111 · Cited by 1,233 · cited 1×
“SDT serves as the theoretical basis for the present study, as it is a prominent motivation theory that has demonstrated its value in the field of education (e.g., Reeve, 2002; Vansteenkiste et al., 2006) and language learning (e.g., Noels et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMotivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters.
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015083 · Cited by 1,226 · cited 1×
“Moreover, consistent with previous research showing that girls are more autonomously motivated for schooling in general (e.g., Vansteenkiste et al., 2009) and have a more favorable motivation to read in particular (e.g., Swalander & Taube, 2007; Wigfield & Guthrie, 1997), girls were expected to be…”
MethodSelf-citationPelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Brière, N. M. (2001) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/a:1014805132406 · Cited by 958
Cited by
Motivation Terminology in Reading Research: A Conceptual Review
Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., & McKenna, M. C. (2014) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9245-z · Cited by 301
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2016) · Developmental Psychopathology · doi:10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy109 · Cited by 299
Self-citationZaccoletti, S., Camacho, A., Correia, N., Aguiar, C., Mason, L., Alves, R. A., & Daniel, J. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592670 · Cited by 209
Reading for pleasure: scrutinising the evidence base – benefits, tensions and recommendations
Cremin, T., & Scholes, L. (2024) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2024.2324948 · Cited by 59
Yu, S., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101857 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., Vansteenkiste, M., & Rosseel, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1006-1021
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2059848506
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 54.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relation between elementary students' recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0027800
- The paper
- De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., Vansteenkiste, M., & Rosseel, Y. (2012). The relation between elementary students' recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027800
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.