Cited by 1,074Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters.

Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Sierens, Eline, Soenens, Bart, Luyckx, Koen, Lens, Willy·2009·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

The present research complements extant variable-centered research that focused on the dimensions of autonomous and controlled motivation through adoption of a person-centered approach for identifying motivational profiles. Both in high school students (Study 1) and college students (Study 2), a cluster analysis revealed 4 motivational profiles: a good quality motivation group (i.e., high autonomous, low controlled); a poor quality motivation group (i.e., low autonomous, high controlled); a low quantity motivation group (i.e., low autonomous, low controlled); and a high quantity motivation group (i.e., high autonomous, high controlled). To compare the 4 groups, the authors derived predictions from qualitative and quantitative perspectives on motivation. Findings generally favored the qualitative perspective; compared with the other groups, the good quality motivation group displayed the most optimal learning pattern and scored highest on perceived need-supportive teaching. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0015083

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2009-08
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
671-688
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2124800699
Cited by
1,074
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 170 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 36
FWCI
31.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
motivational profiles, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, self-determination theory, person-centered approach, high school students, university students, optimal learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review