Cited by 173Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genes, economics, and happiness.

Open access
De Neve, Jan-Emmanuel, Christakis, Nicholas A., Fowler, James H., Frey, Bruno S.·2012·Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics

Abstract

) and life satisfaction. We initially find that individuals with the longer, transcriptionally more efficient variant of this genotype report greater life satisfaction (n=2,545, p=0.012). However, our replication attempts on independent samples produce mixed results indicating that more work needs to be done to better understand the relationship between this genotype and subjective well-being. This work has implications for how economists think about the determinants of utility, and the extent to which exogenous shocks might affect individual well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030292

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 151 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Benjamin DJ Chabris CF Glaeser EL Gudnason V Harris TB Laibson DI Launer L Purcell S Weinstein M Vaupel JW Wachter KW Genoeconomics Biosocial Surveys 2007 Washington, DC The National Academies Press
  2. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A Frijters P How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness The Economic Journal 2004 7 114 641 659
  3. Graham C Durlauf SN Blume LE Economics of happiness The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics 2008 Palgrave Macmillan
  4. Plomin R DeFries JC McClearn GE McGuffin P Behavioral genetics 2008 New York, NY Worth Publishers 5th ed edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Neve, J.-E., Christakis, N. A., Fowler, J. H., & Frey, B. S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Zeppelin Universität gemeinnützige GmbH (DE)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics
Published
2012-11
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
193-211
ISSN
  • 1937-321X (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-318X
OpenAlex
W3121239966
Cited by
148
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
23.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P-01 AG-031093)
  • National Science Foundation (SES0719404)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01-HD31921)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
life satisfaction, subjective well-being, happiness, genetic polymorphism, transcription efficiency, genotypes, external shocks, replication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review