Cited by 38Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Traumatic brain injury, executive functioning, and suicidal behavior: A brief report.

Homaifar, Beeta Y., Brenner, Lisa A., Forster, Jeri E., Nagamoto, Herbert·2012·Rehabilitation Psychology

Abstract

Objective The aim of this pilot study was to explore the relationship between executive dysfunction and suicidal behavior in two groups of participants: (Group 1, n = 18) veterans with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a history of at least one suicide attempt (SA), and (Group 2, n = 29) veterans with TBI and no history of SA. Controlling for the severity of TBI, it was hypothesized that participants in Group 1 would perform more poorly than those in Group 2 on measures of executive functioning. Design The primary outcome variable was decision making as assessed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Secondary outcome variables included laboratory-measured impulsivity as measured by the Immediate and Delayed Memory Test (IMT/DMT), abstract reasoning as measured by the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and aggression as measured by the Lifetime History of Aggression (LHA) scale. Results Among those in Group 1, time between TBI and first suicide attempt postinjury varied widely (months to nearly 30 years). Only the WCST perseverative errors score differed significantly between individuals with and without histories of one or more suicide attempts (SAs). Conclusion Suggestions for future study of SA among those with TBI are provided. When working with individuals with TBI, clinicians are encouraged to incorporate suicide risk assessment into their practice. Augmenting this process with a measure of perseveration may be beneficial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 38

Authors
Homaifar, B. Y., Brenner, L. A., Forster, J. E., & Nagamoto, H.
Affiliations
VA Rocky Mountain Network (US)
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
2012
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
337-341
ISSN
  • 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1544
OpenAlex
W1986625145
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
VISN 19 MIRECC
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, executive dysfunction, suicidal behavior, suicide attempts, veterans, decision-making, Iowa Gambling Task, impulsivity, perseveration, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, aggression, suicide risk assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aggression, Brain Injuries, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Psychometrics, Statistics as Topic, Suicide, Attempted, Veterans, Risk Assessment, Executive Function, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review