Reduced depth inversion illusions in schizophrenia are state-specific and occur for multiple object types and viewing conditions.
Open accessAbstract
Schizophrenia patients are less susceptible to depth inversion illusions (DIIs) in which concave faces appear as convex, but what stimulus attributes generate this effect and how does it vary with clinical state? To address these issues, we had 30 schizophrenia patients and 25 well-matched healthy controls make convexity judgments on physically concave faces and scenes. Patients were selectively sampled from three levels of care to ensure symptom heterogeneity. Half of the concave objects were painted with realistic texture to enhance the convexity illusion; the remaining objects were painted uniform beige to reduce the illusion. Subjects viewed the objects with one eye while laterally moving in front of the stimulus (to see depth via motion parallax) or with two eyes while remaining motionless (to see depth stereoscopically). For each group, DIIs were stronger with texture than without, and weaker with stereoscopic information than without, indicating that patients responded normally to stimulus alterations. More importantly, patients experienced fewer illusions than controls irrespective of the face/scene category, texture, or viewing condition (parallax/stereo). Illusions became less frequent as patients experienced more positive symptoms and required more structured treatment. Taken together, these results indicate that people with schizophrenia experience fewer DIIs with a variety of object types and viewing conditions, perhaps because of a lessened tendency to construe any type of object as convex. Moreover, positive symptoms and the need for structured treatment are associated with more accurate 3-D perception, suggesting that DII may serve as a state marker for the illness.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some authors argue that certain visual illusions rely on some form of top-down processing, a claim that has been contested.
“some authors argue that certain illusions rely on some form of top-down processing (40,41), a claim that has been contested (42,43).”
From Shift toward prior knowledge confers a perceptual advantage in early psychosis and psychosis-prone healthy individuals (2015) · cites this paper as [41]
The findings are not at odds with the decreased susceptibility to some visual illusions observed in schizophrenic patients.
“Our findings are therefore not at odds with decreased susceptibility to some visual illusions in schizophrenic patients (37,38,40,41).”
From Shift toward prior knowledge confers a perceptual advantage in early psychosis and psychosis-prone healthy individuals (2015) · cites this paper as [41]
Studies have identified negative correlations between illusion susceptibility and the presence of positive symptoms in healthy and clinical populations.
“This assumption has strong support in studies that identified negative correlations between illusion susceptibility and the presence of positive symptoms in healthy (Bressan and Kramer, 2013) and clinical populations (Keane et al., 2013; Sanders et al., 2013).”
From What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia (2014) · cites this paper as Keane et al., 2013
Other authors identified an inverse correlation between visual illusions and either positive or negative symptom dimensions.
“other authors identified an inverse correlation with either positive (Norton et al., 2008; Keane et al., 2013; Silverstein et al., 2013) or negative (Tadin et al., 2006; Silverstein et al., 2013) symptom dimensions.”
From What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia (2014) · cites this paper as Keane et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 106
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- First M Spitzer R Gibbon M Willams JBW 2002 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition. (SCID-I/P) New York, NY New York State Psychiatric Institute
- First M Spitzer R Gibbon M Williams JBW 2002 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non-Patient Edition. (SCID-I/NP) New York, NY New York State Psychiatric Institute
- Authors
- Keane, B. P., Silverstein, S. M., Wang, Y., & Papathomas, T. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 506-512
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- PMC
- PMC4155576
- OpenAlex
- W2126283334
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-02-16)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Sponsor name not included (F32MH094102, R01MH093439)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, 3D perception, positive symptoms, stereoscopic viewing, motion parallax, texture, face perception, object perception
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Depth Perception, Face, Female, Humans, Illusions, Male, Middle Aged, Perceptual Disorders, Photic Stimulation, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Vision, Binocular, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review