The impact of betrayal trauma on the tendency to trust.
Abstract
Early experiences of violation perpetrated by close others, or betrayal traumas, may interfere with developing social capacities, including the ability to make healthy decisions about whom to trust. Betrayal trauma theory posits that survivors of trauma are at increased risk of making inaccurate trust decisions in interpersonal contexts, thus interfering with intimacy and elevating risk for revictimization. The current study examined the impact of betrayal trauma exposure on trust tendencies using both self-report and behavioral measures in a college sample. Self-report measures were used to explore general and relational (partner-specific) trust. The Trust Game, an experimental economics task, was used to investigate differences in trust tendencies between participants with and without histories of high betrayal trauma. As predicted, and in line with previous findings, high betrayal trauma exposure was associated with lower levels of self-reported general and relational trust. Self-reported general trust correlated positively with behavior during the Trust Game. Contrary to our hypothesis, participants with high betrayal trauma histories were not significantly more or less willing to trust during the Trust Game. Future directions and clinical implications are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Given that betrayal traumas involve violation of trust, negative social reactions are likely to reinforce these beliefs.
“Given that betrayal traumas involve violation of trust (Gobin & Freyd, 2014), negative social reactions are likely to reinforce these beliefs.”
From The association between social support and posttraumatic stress symptoms among survivors of betrayal trauma: a meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as Gobin & Freyd, 2014
Cites
Zak, P. J. (2008) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0608-88 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boals, A. (2023) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102301 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Tirone, V., Orlowska, D., Lofgreen, A. M., Blais, R. K., Stevens, N. R., Klassen, B., Held, P., & Zalta, A. K. (2021) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2021.1883925 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Stein, J. Y., Itzhaky, L., Levi-Belz, Y., & Solomon, Z. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00281 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gobin, R. L., & Freyd, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- University of Oregon (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 505-511
- ISSN
- 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-969X
- OpenAlex
- W2170803554
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation
- Ford Foundation
- Sponsor name not included
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- betrayal trauma, trust, interpersonal trust, trust game, revictimization, intimate relationships, trauma exposure, trust behavior, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review