The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Priming self-determined and non-self-determined group identification: Effects on well-being and ingroup bias.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J. (1983) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168300700301 · Cited by 1,564
(2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203813195 · Cited by 993
Motivations to identify with social groups: A look at their positive and negative consequences.
Amiot, C. E., & Sansfaçon, S. (2011) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0023158 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image
Golec de Zavala, A., Dyduch‐Hazar, K., & Lantos, D. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12569 · Cited by 200
“Such results corroborate previous findings, linking ingroup satisfaction to positive emotionality, prosociality, and psychological well-being (Amiot & Aubin, 2013; Yampolsky & Amiot, 2013).”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- Yampolsky, M. A., & Amiot, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 137-149
- ISSN
- 1089-2699 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7802
- OpenAlex
- W2314969204
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- group identification, self-determination, priming, in-group favoritism, well-being, social identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
