Cited by 1,564Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

The Cost of Dichotomization

Open access
Cohen, Jacob·1983·Applied Psychological Measurement

Abstract

Assuming bivariate normality with correlation r, dichotomizing one variable at the mean results in the reduction in variance accounted for to .647r²; and dichotomizing both at the mean, to .405r². These losses, in turn, result in reduction in statistical power equivalent to discarding 38% and 60% of the cases under representative conditions. As dichotomization departs from the mean, the costs in variance accounted for and in power are even larger. Consequences of this practice in measurement applications are considered. These losses may not be quite so large in real data, but since methods are available for making use of all the original scaling information, there is no reason to sustain them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014662168300700301

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, J.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Jacob
Venue
Applied Psychological Measurement
Published
1983-06
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
249-253
ISSN
  • 0146-6216 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3497
OpenAlex
W1987838173
Cited by
1,564
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 60
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
dichotomization, variable reduction, bivariate normal distribution, correlation, variance accounted for, statistical power, measurement loss, scale reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review