Child care and cortisol across early childhood: Context matters.
Abstract
A considerable body of literature suggests that children's child-care experiences may impact adrenocortical functioning in early childhood. Yet emerging findings also suggest that the magnitude and sometimes the direction of child-care effects on development may be markedly different for children from higher risk contexts. Using data from a large population-based sample of families from predominantly low-income backgrounds in rural communities, we tested the degree to which links between children's child-care experiences (at 7-36 months) and their subsequent cortisol levels (at 48 months) were moderated by their level of cumulative environmental risk. Our results provided evidence of a crossover interaction between cumulative risk and child-care quantity. For children from low-risk contexts, greater weekly hours in child care were predictive of higher cortisol levels. In contrast, for children facing several cumulative risk factors, greater hours in child care per week were predictive of lower cortisol levels. These effects were robust after adjusting for several controls, including children's cortisol levels in early infancy. Child-care quality and type were not predictive of children's cortisol levels, and neither mitigated the conditional effect of child-care quantity on cortisol. These findings suggest that links between child care and children's development may differ as a function of children's broader ecologies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More time in out-of-home care when the home environment is very low is associated with a lower resting level of cortisol.
“Conversely, more time in out-of-home care when the quality of the home environment is very low is associated with a lower resting level of cortisol”
From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Berry et al. 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 74 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Berry, D., Family Life Project Key Investigators, Blair, C., Ursache, A., Willoughby, M., Garrett-Peters, P., Vernon-Feagans, L., Bratsch-Hines, M., Mills-Koonce, W. R., & Granger, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- New York University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 514-525
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2095011352
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 25.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1PO1HD39667 and 2PO1HD039667)
- National Institute of Drug Abuse
- National Institutes of Health
- National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
- Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- child care, cortisol, early childhood, low-income households, rural communities, moderation, child care quality
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Child Care, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Infant, Male, Regression Analysis, Rural Population, Saliva, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review