Cited by 81Academic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyPsychology Research and BibliometricsCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contributions of internationalization to psychology: Toward a global and inclusive discipline.

van de Vijver, Fons J. R.·2013·American Psychologist

Abstract

In this article I define and describe the current state of internationalization in psychology. Internationalization refers here to the approach in which existing or new psychological theories, methods, procedures, or data across cultures are synthesized so as to create a more culture-informed, inclusive, and globally applicable science and profession. This approach is essential to advance psychology beyond its Euro-American context of development and to achieve a more global applicability of its theories and professional procedures. Internationalization already has led to a better integration of cultural aspects in various psychological theories, to more insight into how to deal with methodological aspects of intact group comparisons (such as bias and equivalence), and to the development of guidelines in areas such as test development, test adaptations, ethics codes, and Internet testing. I review systemic and scientific climate factors in psychology that thwart the progress of internationalization, and conclude by suggesting methods of enhancing internationalization, which is essential for developing a truly universal psychology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0033762

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
van de Vijver, F. J. R.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
van de Vijver, Fons J. R.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2013
Volume
68
Issue
8
Pages
761-770
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2143459052
Cited by
81
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
16.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
internationalization of psychology, cross-cultural psychology, cultural inclusion, measurement invariance, test adaptation, test development, research ethics codes
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Data Collection, Ethics, Professional, Forecasting, Humans, Psychological Theory, Psychology, Guidelines as Topic, Internationality, Cultural Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review