The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contributions of internationalization to psychology: Toward a global and inclusive discipline.
Abstract
In this article I define and describe the current state of internationalization in psychology. Internationalization refers here to the approach in which existing or new psychological theories, methods, procedures, or data across cultures are synthesized so as to create a more culture-informed, inclusive, and globally applicable science and profession. This approach is essential to advance psychology beyond its Euro-American context of development and to achieve a more global applicability of its theories and professional procedures. Internationalization already has led to a better integration of cultural aspects in various psychological theories, to more insight into how to deal with methodological aspects of intact group comparisons (such as bias and equivalence), and to the development of guidelines in areas such as test development, test adaptations, ethics codes, and Internet testing. I review systemic and scientific climate factors in psychology that thwart the progress of internationalization, and conclude by suggesting methods of enhancing internationalization, which is essential for developing a truly universal psychology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cultural context likely reflects broader systemic influences—including variations in academic expectations, school structures, and sleep norms—rather than a single explanatory mechanism (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; van de Vijver, 2013).”
From The Effect of Sleep Quality on Academic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study (2026) · cites this paper as van de Vijver, 2013
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n · Cited by 6,060
Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.212 · Cited by 647
Social phobia syndrome in Japan
Takahashi, T. (1989) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0010-440x(89)90117-x · Cited by 128
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?
Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C., & Arnett, J. J. (2021) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000622 · Cited by 521
Cheon, B. K., Melani, I., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620927269 · Cited by 233
The Effect of Sleep Quality on Academic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
Zhou, J., Liu, Y., Yue, C., Wang, M., Chen, K., & Rosales, K. P. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16050634 · Cited by 1
“Cultural context likely reflects broader systemic influences— including variations in academic expectations, school structures, and sleep norms—rather than a single explanatory mechanism (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; van de Vijver, 2013).”
Metadata
- Authors
- van de Vijver, F. J. R.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- van de Vijver, Fons J. R.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 761-770
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2143459052
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- internationalization of psychology, cross-cultural psychology, cultural inclusion, measurement invariance, test adaptation, test development, research ethics codes
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Cultural Comparison, Data Collection, Ethics, Professional, Forecasting, Humans, Psychological Theory, Psychology, Guidelines as Topic, Internationality, Cultural Competency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review