Reversing one’s fortune by pushing away bad luck.
Abstract
Across cultures, people try to "undo" bad luck with superstitious rituals such as knocking on wood, spitting, or throwing salt. We suggest that these rituals reduce the perceived likelihood of anticipated negative outcomes because they involve avoidant actions that exert force away from one's representation of self, which simulates the experience of pushing away bad luck. Five experiments test this hypothesis by having participants tempt fate and then engage in avoidant actions that are either superstitious (Experiment 1, knocking on wood) or nonsuperstitious (Experiments 2-5, throwing a ball). We find that participants who knock down (away from themselves) or throw a ball think that a jinxed negative outcome is less likely than participants who knock up (toward themselves) or hold a ball. Experiments 3 and 4 provide evidence that after tempting fate, engaging in an avoidant action leads to less clear mental representations for the jinxed event, which, in turn, leads to lower perceived likelihoods. Finally, we demonstrate that engaging in an avoidant action-rather than creating physical distance-is critical for reversing the perceived effect of the jinx. Although superstitions are often culturally defined, the underlying psychological processes that give rise to them may be shared across cultures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on superstitious behaviors shows that when people engage in avoidant rituals, such as knocking down on wood, they worry less about a possible jinxed outcome, compared with when they knock up on wood.
“Research on superstitious behaviors shows that when people engage in avoidant rituals, such as knocking down on wood (i.e., pushing away from oneself), they worry less about a possible jinxed outcome, compared with when they knock up on wood (i.e., pulling in toward oneself).”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Zhang, Risen, & Hosey, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Risen, J. L., & Hosey, C.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1171-1184
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2162172705
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National University of Singapore (R-316-000-085-112)
- University of Chicago
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- superstition, misfortune, self-representation, mental representation, physical distance, cross-cultural universality
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Motor Activity, Random Allocation, Superstitions, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review