Cited by 65Paranormal Experiences and BeliefsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Reversing one’s fortune by pushing away bad luck.

Zhang, Yan, Risen, Jane L., Hosey, Christine·2014·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Across cultures, people try to "undo" bad luck with superstitious rituals such as knocking on wood, spitting, or throwing salt. We suggest that these rituals reduce the perceived likelihood of anticipated negative outcomes because they involve avoidant actions that exert force away from one's representation of self, which simulates the experience of pushing away bad luck. Five experiments test this hypothesis by having participants tempt fate and then engage in avoidant actions that are either superstitious (Experiment 1, knocking on wood) or nonsuperstitious (Experiments 2-5, throwing a ball). We find that participants who knock down (away from themselves) or throw a ball think that a jinxed negative outcome is less likely than participants who knock up (toward themselves) or hold a ball. Experiments 3 and 4 provide evidence that after tempting fate, engaging in an avoidant action leads to less clear mental representations for the jinxed event, which, in turn, leads to lower perceived likelihoods. Finally, we demonstrate that engaging in an avoidant action-rather than creating physical distance-is critical for reversing the perceived effect of the jinx. Although superstitions are often culturally defined, the underlying psychological processes that give rise to them may be shared across cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on superstitious behaviors shows that when people engage in avoidant rituals, such as knocking down on wood, they worry less about a possible jinxed outcome, compared with when they knock up on wood.

    “Research on superstitious behaviors shows that when people engage in avoidant rituals, such as knocking down on wood (i.e., pushing away from oneself), they worry less about a possible jinxed outcome, compared with when they knock up on wood (i.e., pulling in toward oneself).”

    From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Zhang, Risen, & Hosey, 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 65

Authors
Zhang, Y., Risen, J. L., & Hosey, C.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2014
Volume
143
Issue
3
Pages
1171-1184
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2162172705
Cited by
65
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National University of Singapore (R-316-000-085-112)
  • University of Chicago
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
superstition, misfortune, self-representation, mental representation, physical distance, cross-cultural universality
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Motor Activity, Random Allocation, Superstitions, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review