The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation.
Abstract
What sorts of trait information do people most care about when forming impressions of others? Recent research in social cognition suggests that "warmth," broadly construed, should be of prime importance in impression formation. Yet, some prior research suggests that information about others' specifically moral traits--their moral "character"--may be a primary dimension. Although warmth and character have sometimes been conceived of as interchangeable, we argue that they are separable, and that across a wide variety of contexts, character is usually more important than warmth in impression formation. We first showed that moral character and social warmth traits are indeed separable (Studies 1 and 2). Further studies that used correlational and experimental methods showed that, as predicted, in most contexts, moral character information is more important in impression formation than is warmth information (Studies 2-6). Character information was also more important than warmth information with respect to judgments of traits' perceived fundamentalness to identity, their uniquely human quality, their context-independence, and their controllability (Study 2). Finally, Study 7 used an archival method to show that moral character information appears more prominently than warmth information in obituaries, and more strongly determines the impressions people form of the individuals described in those obituaries. We discuss implications for current theories of person perception and social cognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 · Cited by 4,567
The self-importance of moral identity
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423 · Cited by 3,522
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919 · cited 1×
“That is, moral character might be seen as what Haslam and colleagues refer to as a uniquely human characteristic—one that sets us apart from other species (Haslam, 2006; Haslam, Bain, Douge, Lee, & Bastian, 2005).”
BackgroundFirst Impressions: Making Up Your Mind After a 100-Ms Exposure to a Face
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x · Cited by 2,300
Cited by
Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.005 · Cited by 596
Ellemers, N., van der Toorn, J., Paunov, Y., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868318811759 · Cited by 394
Abele, A. E., Ellemers, N., Fiske, S. T., Koch, A., & Yzerbyt, V. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000262 · Cited by 380
On the Importance of Being Moral: The Distinctive Role of Morality in Social Judgment
Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397 · Cited by 373
Microfoundations of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility
Shea, C. T., & Hawn, O. V. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0795 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 148-168
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2048748732
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0034726
- The paper
- Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.