Cited by 131Emotions and Moral BehaviorPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentChild and Animal Learning Development

The role of moral emotions in the development of children’s sharing behavior.

Ongley, Sophia F., Malti, Tina·2014·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated the role of moral emotions in the development of children's sharing behavior (N = 244 4-, 8-, and 12-year-old children). Children's sympathy was measured with both self- and primary caregiver-reports, and participants anticipated their negatively and positively valenced moral emotions (i.e., feeling guilty, sad, or bad; and feeling proud, happy, or good) following actions that either violated or upheld moral norms. Sharing was measured through children's allocation of resources in the dictator game. Children's self-reported sympathy emerged as a significant predictor of sharing in early childhood. For children with low levels of sympathy, sharing was also predicted by negatively valenced moral emotions following the failure to perform prosocial actions. In addition, results demonstrated an age-related increase in sharing for boys between ages 4 and 8 and a decrease in sharing for boys between ages 8 and 12. We discuss the findings in relation to the emergence of 2 compensatory emotional pathways to sharing, 1 via sympathy and 1 via negatively valenced moral emotions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0035191

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This finding extends previous work regarding anticipated emotions by highlighting one developmental factor that could explain developmental differences in children's sharing behavior.

    “This finding extends previous work regarding anticipated emotions (Gummerum, Hanoch, Keller, Parsons, & Hummel, 2010; Ongley & Malti, 2014; Paulus & Moore, 2017) by highlighting one developmental factor that could explain developmental differences in children's sharing behavior.”
  • Previous studies reported a stronger role for negative than positive emotions.

    “In addition, also previous studies reported a stronger role for negative than positive emotions (Ongley & Malti, 2014; Paulus & Moore, 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ongley, S. F., & Malti, T.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2014-04
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
1148-1159
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2317341792
Cited by
131
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
moral emotions, sharing behavior, sympathy, guilt, prosocial behavior, dictator game, resource allocation, moral development, children, age differences, gender differences, moral norms
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Child Behavior, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, Caregivers, Moral Development, Self Report, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review