Cited by 88Social and Intergroup PsychologyNames, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Selective incivility: Immigrant groups experience subtle workplace discrimination at different rates.

Open access
Krings, Franciska, Johnston, Claire, Binggeli, Steve, Maggiori, Christian·2014·Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology

Abstract

Immigrants play an increasingly important role in local labor markets. Not only do they grow steadily in number but also in cultural, educational, and skill diversity, underlining the necessity to distinguish between immigrant groups when studying discrimination against immigrants. We examined immigrant employees' subtle discrimination experiences in a representative sample in Switzerland, controlling for dispositional influences. Results showed that mainly members of highly competitive immigrant groups, from immediate neighbor countries, experienced workplace incivility and that these incivility experiences were related to higher likelihoods of perceived discrimination at work. This research confirms recent accounts that successful but disliked groups are particularly likely to experience subtle interpersonal discrimination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0035436

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In employment, discrimination may occur at the level of job offer, salary, promotion, additional training opportunities, and firing, as well as discrimination by coworkers and clients.

    “In terms of employment, discrimination may occur at the level of job offer, salary, promotion, additional training opportunities, and firing, as well as discrimination by coworkers and clients (see also Esses et al. 2014, Krings et al. 2014).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Krings et al. 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 88

Authors
Krings, F., Johnston, C., Binggeli, S., & Maggiori, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • Rice University (US)
Venue
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
Published
2014-10
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
491-498
ISSN
  • 1077-341X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0106
  • 1099-9809
OpenAlex
W2136278695
Cited by
88
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
workplace incivility, immigrant employees, perceived discrimination, interpersonal discrimination
MeSH terms
Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Employment, Europe, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Prejudice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Race Relations, Social Behavior, Stereotyping, Switzerland, Organizational Culture, Workplace, White People, Emigrants and Immigrants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review