Cited by 31Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Female juvenile play elicits Fos expression in dopaminergic neurons of the VTA.

Northcutt, Katharine V., Nguyen, Jennifer M. K.·2014·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Juveniles of many species engage in rough-and-tumble play behaviors, and these social encounters are important for the expression of typical social behaviors. Play is a highly motivated and rewarding behavior, which suggests that the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system is likely important for reinforcing the behavior. Indeed, systemic dopamine receptor antagonists decrease the expression of play behaviors, but the specific dopaminergic networks important for play are not known. In this study, we examined immediate-early gene expression in specific dopaminergic cell groups after juvenile male and female rats played or did not play. Subjects were housed with a same-sex sibling, and spontaneous play behavior (or lack thereof) was observed for 1 hr. Brains were harvested and immunohistochemistry was used to localize Fos and tyrosine hydroxylase. Cells expressing both proteins were counted in midbrain and forebrain dopaminergic cell groups. Females that played had more double-labeled cells in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) than females that did not play, but there was no effect of play on double-labeled cell counts in any brain region in males. Furthermore, many measures of play in females were positively correlated with the number of double-labeled cells in the VTA, including play duration and pin duration. Our results suggest that play in females likely induces dopamine release from mesocorticolimbic neurons to reinforce play behaviors. Our results also highlight a sex differenc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0035964

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Northcutt, K. V., & Nguyen, J. M. K.
Affiliations
Mercer University (US)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2014-04
Volume
128
Issue
2
Pages
178-186
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2316741845
Cited by
31
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Mercer University
  • Mercer University Biomedical Scholars fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
rough-and-tumble play, sex differences, ventral tegmental area, dopaminergic neurons, Fos expression, immediate early genes, mesocorticolimbic dopamine system, reward, social behavior, tyrosine hydroxylase, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Male, Play and Playthings, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Ventral Tegmental Area, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review